Systematic Review of Patient Decision Aids for Stroke Prevention Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Management

被引:5
作者
Baers, Justin H. [1 ]
Adekanye, Joel [1 ]
Hazlewood, Glen [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Jan M. [3 ,4 ]
Caird, Jeff K. [1 ,4 ]
Wilton, Stephen B. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Med, Calgary, AB T2N 2TP, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Fac Arts, Dept Psychol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Libin Cardiovasc Inst, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
关键词
atrial fibrillation; patient decision aids; systematic review; stroke prevention; ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY; BIAS;
D O I
10.31083/j.rcm2310353
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of stroke. Oral anticoagulation can reduce the risk of AF-associated stroke by 65% but it remains underused. Stroke prevention therapy in patients with AF has been considered a good target for shared decision making with patient decision aids as it is a long-term, preference-sensitive decision with known risk-benefit trade-offs. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize published literature on the effectiveness of patient decision aids on the choice of and adherence to stroke prevention therapy in individuals with AF. Methods: We conducted a structured literature search for prospective studies evaluating decision aids for AF stroke prevention therapy in adult patients with nonvalvular AF. We included studies that compared those exposed to a decision aid with a control condition for outcomes including choice of therapy, adherence, decisional conflict and patient knowledge. Quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible due to excessive between-study heterogeneity. Results: Eight studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Six studies were randomized clinical trials and two were pre-post comparisons. Of the 8 studies, each evaluated a different decision aid, with only three including all contemporary oral anticoagulant drugs. All decision aids improved AF knowledge compared to baseline or control and decision aids reduced decisional conflict in four of six studies. However, there were inconsistent effects of the studied decision aids on initiation of oral anticoagulation. Adherence to initial stroke prevention therapy choice appeared to benefit from decision aid use in 2 studies that addressed this issue. Conclusions: Decision aids for stroke prevention increased AF patients' knowledge and decisional confidence but had variable impacts on choice of and adherence to stroke prevention therapy. The results highlight the need for well-designed decision aids that present patients with all contemporary therapeutic options.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Burden of Atrial Fibrillation-Associated Ischemic Stroke in the United States [J].
Alkhouli, Mohamad ;
Alqahtani, Fahad ;
Aljohani, Sami ;
Alvi, Muhammad ;
Holmes, David R. .
JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (05) :618-625
[2]   The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation [J].
Andrade, Jason G. ;
Aguilar, Martin ;
Atzema, Clare ;
Bell, Alan ;
Cairns, John A. ;
Cheung, Christopher C. ;
Cox, Jafna L. ;
Dorian, Paul ;
Gladstone, David J. ;
Healey, Jeff S. ;
Khairy, Paul ;
Leblanc, Kori ;
McMurtry, M. Sean ;
Mitchell, L. Brent ;
Nair, Girish M. ;
Nattel, Stanley ;
Parkash, Ratika ;
Pilote, Louise ;
Sandhu, Roopinder K. ;
Sarrazin, Jean-Francois ;
Sharma, Mukul ;
Skanes, Allan C. ;
Talajic, Mario ;
Tsang, Teresa S. M. ;
Verma, Atul ;
Verma, Subodh ;
Whitlock, Richard ;
Wyse, D. George ;
Macle, Laurent .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (12) :1847-1948
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies [internet]
[4]  
Chew Derek S, 2022, CMAJ Open, V10, pE702, DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20210246
[5]   RETRACTED: Pharmacological cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and flutter (Review) - art. no. CD003713.pub2 (Retracted Article) [J].
Cordina, J ;
Mead, G .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (02)
[6]  
DUNBAR J, 1984, Controlled Clinical Trials, V5, P515, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(84)90012-6
[7]   A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Decision Support Tool to Improve the Quality of Communication and Decision-Making in Individuals with Atrial Fibrillation [J].
Fraenkel, Liana ;
Street, Richard L., Jr. ;
Towle, Virginia ;
O'Leary, John R. ;
Iannone, Lynne ;
Van Ness, Peter H. ;
Fried, Terri R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (08) :1434-1441
[8]   Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support systems [J].
George, JF ;
Duffy, K ;
Ahuja, M .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2000, 29 (02) :195-206
[9]   Mobile Health Technology for Atrial Fibrillation Management Integrating Decision Support, Education, and Patient Involvement: mAF App Trial [J].
Guo, Yutao ;
Chen, Yundai ;
Lane, Deirdre A. ;
Liu, Lihong ;
Wang, Yutang ;
Lip, Gregory Y. H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 130 (12) :1388-+
[10]   Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation [J].
Hart, Robert G. ;
Pearce, Lesly A. ;
Aguilar, Maria I. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 146 (12) :857-867