ENGINEERING RESILIENCE QUANTIFICATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN IMPLICATIONS: A LITERATURE SURVEY

被引:0
作者
Yodo, Nita [1 ]
Wang, Pingfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Wichita State Univ, Wichita, KS 67260 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 2A | 2016年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SEISMIC RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; PERSPECTIVE; METRICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A resilient system is a system that possesses the ability to survive and recover from the likelihood damage of disruptive events or mishaps. The concept that incorporates resiliency into engineering practices is known as engineering resilience. To date, engineering resilience is still predominantly application oriented. Despite an increased popularity of engineering resilience usage, the diversity of its application in various engineering sectors complicates the universal agreements on its quantification and measurement techniques. There is a pressing need to develop a universal framework, which standardize the modeling, assessment, and improvement of engineering resilience for a broader engineering discipline. This paper provides a literature survey of engineering resilience from the design perspective with the focuses on engineering resilience metrics and their design implications. The currently available engineering resilience quantification metrics are reviewed and summarized, the design implications towards the development of resilient engineering systems are discussed, and further the challenges of incorporating resilience into engineering design processes are evaluated. The presented study expects to serve as the building blocks towards developing a generally applicable engineering resilience quantification metrics that can be used for system design.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Power system resilience quantification and enhancement strategy for real-time operation
    Kumar, Roshan
    De, Mala
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 106 (05) : 6227 - 6250
  • [22] System-of-Systems Resilience Analysis and Design Using Bayesian and Dynamic Bayesian Networks
    Jiao, Tianci
    Yuan, Hao
    Wang, Jing
    Ma, Jun
    Li, Xiaoling
    Luo, Aimin
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (16)
  • [23] Static Resilience of Large Flexible Engineering Systems: Axiomatic Design Model and Measures
    Farid, Amro M.
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (04): : 2006 - 2017
  • [24] A resilience engineering approach to integrating human and socio-technical system capacities and processes for national infrastructure resilience
    Thomas, John E.
    Eisenberg, Daniel A.
    Seager, Thomas P.
    Fisher, Erik
    JOURNAL OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 16 (02)
  • [25] A Survey on Digital Twin: Definitions, Characteristics, Applications, and Design Implications
    Barricelli, Barbara Rita
    Casiraghi, Elena
    Fogli, Daniela
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 167653 - 167671
  • [26] Requirement Engineering in the Age of System and Product Complexity - A Literature Review
    Vieriboeck, Maximilian
    Nilchiani, Roshanak R.
    7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (IEEE ISSE 2021), 2021,
  • [27] Nine Principles for Design for the Developing World as Derived From the Engineering Literature
    Mattson, Christopher A.
    Wood, Amy E.
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2014, 136 (12)
  • [28] Flexible design in water and wastewater engineering - Definitions, literature and decision guide
    Spiller, Marc
    Vreeburg, Jan H. G.
    Leusbrock, Ingo
    Zeeman, Grietje
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 149 : 271 - 281
  • [29] Power System Design for Resilience and Flexibility against Extreme Weather Events
    Abdin, Islam F.
    Fang, Yiping
    Zio, Enrico
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND SAFETY (ICSRS), 2018, : 321 - 327
  • [30] Mapping the influences of resilience engineering on health, safety, and environment and ergonomics management system by using Z-number cognitive map
    Zarrin, Mansour
    Azadeh, Ali
    HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2019, 29 (02) : 141 - 153