ENGINEERING RESILIENCE QUANTIFICATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN IMPLICATIONS: A LITERATURE SURVEY

被引:0
作者
Yodo, Nita [1 ]
Wang, Pingfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Wichita State Univ, Wichita, KS 67260 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 2A | 2016年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SEISMIC RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; PERSPECTIVE; METRICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A resilient system is a system that possesses the ability to survive and recover from the likelihood damage of disruptive events or mishaps. The concept that incorporates resiliency into engineering practices is known as engineering resilience. To date, engineering resilience is still predominantly application oriented. Despite an increased popularity of engineering resilience usage, the diversity of its application in various engineering sectors complicates the universal agreements on its quantification and measurement techniques. There is a pressing need to develop a universal framework, which standardize the modeling, assessment, and improvement of engineering resilience for a broader engineering discipline. This paper provides a literature survey of engineering resilience from the design perspective with the focuses on engineering resilience metrics and their design implications. The currently available engineering resilience quantification metrics are reviewed and summarized, the design implications towards the development of resilient engineering systems are discussed, and further the challenges of incorporating resilience into engineering design processes are evaluated. The presented study expects to serve as the building blocks towards developing a generally applicable engineering resilience quantification metrics that can be used for system design.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Seismic Resilience of Transportation Networks with Deteriorating Components [J].
Alipour, Alice ;
Shafei, Behrouz .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (08)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 54 AIAA AER SCI M
[3]   Systems Resilience for Multihazard Environments: Definition, Metrics, and Valuation for Decision Making [J].
Ayyub, Bilal M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (02) :340-355
[4]   Stochastic Measures of Network Resilience: Applications to Waterway Commodity Flows [J].
Baroud, Hiba ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. ;
Barker, Kash ;
Rocco, Claudio M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (07) :1317-1335
[5]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[6]   Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation [J].
Carvalho, Helena ;
Barroso, Ana P. ;
Machado, Virginia H. ;
Azevedo, Susana ;
Cruz-Machado, V. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 62 (01) :329-341
[7]  
Cimellaro G P, 2006, QUANTIFICATION SEISM
[8]   Transportation security and the role of resilience: A foundation for operational metrics [J].
Cox, Andrew ;
Prager, Fynnwin ;
Rose, Adam .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2011, 18 (02) :307-317
[9]   ENERGY-FLOW, NUTRIENT CYCLING, AND ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE [J].
DEANGELIS, DL .
ECOLOGY, 1980, 61 (04) :764-771
[10]  
Farid A. M., 2015, STATIC RESILIENCE LA