Evaluation of Information Systems Supporting Asset Lifecycle Management

被引:0
作者
Haider, Abrar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Comp & Informat Sci, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
来源
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS-BK | 2009年 / 24卷
关键词
Information systems; Performance evaluation; Asset management; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Performance evaluation is a subjective activity that cannot be detached from the human understanding, social context, and cultural environment, within which it takes place. Apart from these, information systems evaluation faces certain conceptual and operational challenges that further complicate the process of performance evaluation. This paper deals with the issue of performance evaluation of information system utilised for engineering asset lifecycle. The paper highlights that these information systems not only have to enable asset management strategy, but also are required to inform the same for better lifecycle management of the critical asset equipment utilised in production or service environments. Evaluation of these systems, thus, calls for ascertaining both hard as well as soft benefits to the organisation and their contribution to organizational development. This, however, requires that evaluation exercise identifies alternatives and choices and in doing so becomes a strategic advisory mechanism that supports information systems planning, development, and management processes. This paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation methodology for evaluation of information systems utilised in managing engineering assets. This methodology is learning centric, provides feedback that facilitates actionable organizational learning, and thus allows the organisation to engage in generative learning based continuous improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 917
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Amadi-Echendu J. E., 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574), P1156
[2]  
*ASS LOC GOV ENG N, IIMM INT INFR MAN MA
[3]   Performance effects of using the Balanced Scorecard: a note on the Dutch experience [J].
Braam, GJM ;
Nijssen, EJ .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2004, 37 (04) :335-349
[4]  
Davis S., 2004, Management Accounting Research, V15, P135, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.MAR.2003.11.001, 10.1016/j.mar.2003.11.001]
[5]   Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable [J].
DeLone, William H. ;
McLean, Ephraim R. .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1992, 3 (01) :60-95
[6]   Moving IS evaluation forward: learning themes and research issues [J].
Farbey, B ;
Land, F ;
Targett, D .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1999, 8 (02) :189-207
[7]  
Haider A., 2006, P IN WORLD C ENG ASS
[8]  
Haider A, 2007, THESIS U S AUSTR ADE
[9]   Competing interpretations of computer-supported cooperative work in organizational contexts [J].
Hayes, N ;
Walsham, G .
ORGANIZATION, 2000, 7 (01) :49-67
[10]   Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms [J].
Ittner, CD ;
Larcker, DF ;
Randall, T .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2003, 28 (7-8) :715-741