Evaluation of a Urine On-Site Drugs of Abuse Screening Test in Patients Admitted to a Psychiatric Emergency Unit

被引:17
作者
Bagoien, Gunnhild [1 ,2 ]
Morken, Gunnar [1 ,2 ]
Zahlsen, Kolbjorn [3 ]
Aamo, Trond [3 ]
Spigset, Olav [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Ostmarka Dept Psychiat, N-7441 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Neurosci, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[3] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, N-7441 Trondheim, Norway
[4] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Lab Med Childrens & Womens Hlth, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
on-site urine drug screening test; substance abuse; psychiatric emergency unit; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; DEVICES; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; PATTERNS; MISUSE;
D O I
10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181a45e78
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to characterize the usefulness and reliability of a commonly used urinary on-site drugs of abuse screening test device when used routinely at admittances to a psychiatric emergency unit. Urine samples from 262 emergency psychiatric admittances representing 217 patients were analyzed by a commercially available on-site test for the detection of amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cannabis, cocaine, and opiates in urine. The samples were first screened by nurses at the psychiatric department, thereafter by 2 technicians at the laboratory, and finally, analyzed by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Results of 45.8% of the screening tests were true negative for all 5 drugs/drug groups tested, whereas those of 29.4% were true positive for 1 or several drugs/drug groups and true negative for the others. Thus, in total, 75.2% were correct for all 5 drugs/drug groups. In general, the sensitivities (42.9%-90.0% for the various drug groups) were lower than the specificities (92.7%-100.0%). The accuracies were 86.3% for benzodiazepines, 92.4% for cannabis, 94.7% for opiates, and 97.0% for amphetamines. No cocaine was found in any of the samples. For cannabis, the accuracy was higher among the laboratory technicians than among the nurses. The results from on-site screening testing should not be considered as the final conclusion on the intake of drugs of abuse but must be interpreted with caution.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 254
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ANATH J, 1989, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V40, P297
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Federal Register, V69, P19644
[3]   Acute intoxication and substance abuse among patients presenting to a psychiatric emergency service [J].
Breslow, RE ;
Klinger, BI ;
Erickson, BJ .
GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 18 (03) :183-191
[4]  
Buchan BJ, 1998, J FORENSIC SCI, V43, P395
[5]   Differences between early-phase primary psychotic disorders with concurrrent substance use and substance-induced psychoses [J].
Caton, CLM ;
Drake, RE ;
Hasin, DS ;
Dominguez, B ;
Shrout, PE ;
Samet, S ;
Schanzer, WB .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 62 (02) :137-145
[6]  
Claassen CA, 1997, PSYCHIATR SERV, V48, P353
[7]   A field evaluation of five on-site drug-testing devices [J].
Crouch, DJ ;
Hersch, RK ;
Cook, RF ;
Frank, JF ;
Walsh, JM .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 26 (07) :493-499
[8]   THE ADMISSIBILITY OF POSITIVE EMIT RESULTS AS SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE - COUNTING FACTS, NOT HEADS [J].
DIVOLL, MK ;
GREENBLATT, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) :114-116
[9]  
DRAKE RE, 1989, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V40, P1041
[10]  
ELANGOVAN N, 1993, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V44, P782