Feasibility and efficacy of a robotic device for hand rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized pilot controlled study

被引:69
作者
Vanoglio, Fabio [1 ]
Bernocchi, Palmira [2 ]
Mule, Chiara [3 ]
Garofali, Francesca [1 ]
Mora, Chiara [1 ]
Taveggia, Giovanni [3 ]
Scalvini, Simonetta [2 ]
Luisa, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Inst Lumezzane, Neurol Rehabil Unit, Fdn Salvatore Maugeri, Brescia, Italy
[2] IRCCS, Inst Lumezzane, Care Continu Unit, Fdn Salvatore Maugeri, Brescia, Italy
[3] Habilita Hosp, Bergamo, Italy
关键词
Stroke; rehabilitation; hand; robotics; CONTINUOUS PASSIVE MOTION; UPPER-LIMB; SUBACUTE; THERAPY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1177/0269215516642606
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in improving arm function abilities in sub-acute hemiplegic patients. Design: Randomized controlled pilot study. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation centers. Participants: Thirty hemiplegic stroke patients (Ashworth spasticity index <3) were recruited and randomly divided into a Treatment group (TG) and Control group (CG). Interventions: Patients in the TG received intensive hand training with Gloreha, a hand rehabilitation glove that provides computer-controlled, repetitive, passive mobilization of the fingers, with multisensory feedback. Patients in the CG received the same amount of time in terms of conventional hand rehabilitation. Main outcome measures: Hand motor function (Motricity Index, MI), fine manual dexterity (Nine Hole Peg Test, NHPT) and strength (Grip and Pinch test) were measured at baseline and after rehabilitation, and the differences, () mean(standard deviation), compared between groups. Results Twenty-seven patients concluded the program: 14 in the TG and 13 in the CG. None of the patients refused the device and only one adverse event of rheumatoid arthritis reactivation was reported. Baseline data did not differ significantly between the two groups. In TG, MI 23(16.4), NHPT 0.16(0.16), GRIP 0.27(0.23) and PINCH 0.07(0.07) were significantly greater than in CG, MI 5.2(9.2), NHPT 0.02(0.07), GRIP 0.03(0.06) and PINCH 0.02(0.03)] (p=0.002, p=0.009, p=0.003 and p=0.038, respectively). Conclusions: Gloreha Professional is feasible and effective in recovering fine manual dexterity and strength and reducing arm disability in sub-acute hemiplegic patients.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 360
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review
    Aman, Joshua E.
    Elangovan, Naveen
    Yeh, I-Ling
    Konczak, Juergen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 8
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, P 8 C IT SOC NEUR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, STROK REH LONG TERM
  • [4] Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function
    Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
    Klein, Julius
    Burdet, Etienne
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2010, 23 (06) : 661 - 670
  • [5] Activating the motor system through action observation: is this an efficient approach in adults and children?
    Bassolino, Michela
    Sandini, Giulio
    Pozzo, Thierry
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2015, 57 : 42 - 45
  • [6] Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches
    Beaton, DE
    Wright, JG
    Katz, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) : 1038 - 1046
  • [7] Bohannon RW., 1999, J Phys Ther Sci, V11, P59, DOI [10.1589/jpts.11.59, DOI 10.1589/JPTS.11.59]
  • [8] Borboni A, 2011, 20 C AIMETA BOL IT
  • [9] ARM STUDIO TO INTENSIFY UPPER LIMB REHABILITATION AFTER STROKE: CONCEPT, ACCEPTANCE, UTILIZATION AND PRELIMINARY CLINICAL RESULTS
    Buschfort, R.
    Brocke, J.
    Hess, A.
    Werner, C.
    Waldner, A.
    Hesse, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (04) : 310 - 314
  • [10] Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Coupar, Fiona
    Pollock, Alex
    Rowe, Phil
    Weir, Christopher
    Langhorne, Peter
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 26 (04) : 291 - 313