Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality

被引:54
作者
Sonni, Ida [1 ,3 ]
Baratto, Lucia [1 ]
Park, Sonya [1 ]
Hatami, Negin [1 ]
Srinivas, Shyam [1 ]
Davidzon, Guido [1 ]
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam [1 ,2 ]
Iagaru, Andrei [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Mol Imaging Program Stanford, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Mol Biophys & Integrated Bioimaging, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
PET/CT; Acquisition time; Silicon photomultipliers; Detectors; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; OF-FLIGHT; PET/MRI; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: A newly introduced PET/CT scanner (Discovery Meaningful Insights-DMI, GE Healthcare) includes the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with time-of- flight (TOF) technology first used in the GE SIGNA PET/MRI. In this study, we investigated the impact of various acquisition times on image quality using this SiPM-based PET/CT. Methods: We reviewed data from 58 participants with cancer who were scanned using the DMI PET/CT scanner. The administered dosages ranged 295.3-429.9 MBq (mean +/- SD 356.3 +/- 37.4) and imaging started at 71-142 min (mean +/- SD 101.41 +/- 17. 52) after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The patients' BMI ranged 19.79-46. 16 (mean +/- SD 26.55 +/- 5.53). We retrospectively reconstructed the raw TOF data at 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at the standard image acquisition time per clinical protocol (180 or 210 s/bed depending on BMI). Each reconstruction was reviewed blindly by two nuclear medicine physicians and scored 1-5 (1-poor, 5-excellent quality). The liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was used as a quantitative measure of image quality. Results: The average scores +/- SD of the readers were 2.61 +/- 0.83, 3.70 +/- 0.92, 4.36 +/- 0.82, 4.82 +/- 0.39, and 4.91 +/- 0.91 for the 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at standard acquisition time, respectively. Inter-reader agreement on image quality assessment was good, with a weighted kappa of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.81). In the evaluation of the effects of time per bed acquisition on semi-quantitative measurements, we found that the only time point significantly different from the standard time were 30 and 60 s (both with P < 0.001). The effects of dose and BMI were not statistically significant (P = 0.195 and 0.098, respectively). There was a significant positive effect of time on SNR (P < 0.001), as well as a significant negative effect of weight (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggest that despite significant delays from injection to imaging (due to comparison with standard PET/CT) compared to standard clinical operations and even in a population with average BMI > 25, images can be acquired as fast as 90 s/bed using the SiPM PET/CT and still result in very good image quality (average score > 4).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   18F-FDG silicon photomultiplier PET/CT: A pilot study comparing semi-quantitative measurements with standard PET/CT [J].
Baratto, Lucia ;
Park, Sonya Young ;
Hatami, Negin ;
Davidzon, Guido ;
Srinivas, Shyam ;
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam ;
Iagaru, Andrei .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06)
[2]   PET/MR in Dementia and Other Neurodegenerative Diseases [J].
Barthel, Henryk ;
Schroeter, Matthias L. ;
Hoffmann, Karl-Titus ;
Sabri, Osama .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (03) :224-233
[3]  
Beyer T, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P1369
[4]   PET/MRI: Emerging Clinical Applications in Oncology [J].
Fraum, Tyler J. ;
Fowler, Kathryn J. ;
McConathy, Jonathan .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (02) :220-236
[5]   Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0 [J].
Fukukita, Hiroyoshi ;
Senda, Michio ;
Terauchi, Takashi ;
Suzuki, Kazufumi ;
Daisaki, Hiromitsu ;
Matsumoto, Keiichi ;
Ikari, Yasuhiko ;
Hayashi, Masuo .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (04) :325-334
[6]   Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography [J].
Gambhir, SS .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2002, 2 (09) :683-693
[7]   Variations in PET/CT Methodology for Oncologic Imaging at US Academic Medical Centers: An Imaging Response Assessment Team Survey [J].
Graham, Michael M. ;
Badawi, Ramsey D. ;
Wahl, Richard L. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (02) :311-317
[8]   Simultaneous PET/MR imaging with a radio frequency- penetrable PET insert [J].
Grant, Alexander M. ;
Lee, Brian J. ;
Chang, Chen-Ming ;
Levin, Craig S. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (01) :112-120
[9]   Studies of a Next-Generation Silicon-Photomultiplier-Based Time-of-Flight PET/CT System [J].
Hsu, David F. C. ;
Ilan, Ezgi ;
Peterson, William T. ;
Uribe, Jorge ;
Lubberink, Mark ;
Levin, Craig S. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (09) :1511-1518
[10]  
Iagaru A, 2015, CLIN NUCL MED, V40, P1, DOI 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000611