Registration of MEG/EEG data with 3D MRI: Methodology and precision issues

被引:33
作者
Schwartz, D
Lemoine, D
Poiseau, E
Barillot, C
机构
[1] UNIV RENNES 1,CERIUM,RENNES,FRANCE
[2] BIOMAGNET TECHNOL GMBH,AACHEN,GERMANY
关键词
MEG; MRI; data fusion; localization; anatomical constraint; registration evaluation; multimodal registration;
D O I
10.1007/BF01200710
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Mapping neuro-physiological functions to high resolution MRI is an effective means to evaluate localization reconstructions and to exhibit the spatio-temporal aspects of dynamic functional processes. The registration step needed between MEG/EEG and MRI is a source of error which, for the worst cases may be greater than errors related to the localization algorithms. Several registration methods can be used: those based on fiducial markers and those based on surface matching. The aim of this paper is to propose a fully automatic surface matching method and to discuss its extended theoretical and experimental evaluation. The registration procedure matches the skin surface, segmented from MRI, and a digitized description of the head performed with a 3D tracker during the MEG/EEG examination. The registration uncertainties at the edges of the MRI volume were estimated to be between 2 and 3 mm. In comparison with commonly used manual methods the improvement in accuracy is significant. Registration uncertainties are smaller than the localization uncertainties usually observed. By minimizing manual intervention, the reliability of the registration process is increased and the accuracy is stabilized. With this automatic registration method the fusion of MEG/EEG localizations with MRI anatomical data gives highly significant information. Finally the accuracy obtained allows the use of complex anatomical constraints in the localization process without introducing large modelling errors.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 116
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   DISTANCE TRANSFORMATIONS IN DIGITAL IMAGES [J].
BORGEFORS, G .
COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1986, 34 (03) :344-371
[2]  
BOULIOU A, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPIN S, V1, P105
[3]   A TECHNIQUE FOR ACCURATE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE PRESENCE OF FIELD INHOMOGENEITIES [J].
CHANG, H ;
FITZPATRICK, JM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1992, 11 (03) :319-329
[4]   MEG VERSUS EEG LOCALIZATION TEST USING IMPLANTED SOURCES IN THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
COHEN, D ;
CUFFIN, BN ;
YUNOKUCHI, K ;
MANIEWSKI, R ;
PURCELL, C ;
COSGROVE, GR ;
IVES, J ;
KENNEDY, JG ;
SCHOMER, DL .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 28 (06) :811-817
[5]   EFFECTS OF LOCAL VARIATIONS IN SKULL AND SCALP THICKNESS ON EEGS AND MEGS [J].
CUFFIN, BN .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 40 (01) :42-48
[6]   EFFECTS OF HEAD SHAPE ON EEGS AND MEGS [J].
CUFFIN, BN .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1990, 37 (01) :44-52
[7]   IMPROVED LOCALIZATION OF CORTICAL ACTIVITY BY COMBINING EEG AND MEG WITH MRI CORTICAL SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION - A LINEAR-APPROACH [J].
DALE, AM ;
SERENO, MI .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (02) :162-176
[8]  
Ebersole J S, 1995, Neuroimaging Clin N Am, V5, P267
[9]  
EVANS AC, 1989, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1092, P264
[10]   COORDINATE SYSTEM MATCHING FOR NEUROMAGNETIC AND MORPHOLOGICAL RECONSTRUCTION OVERLAY [J].
FUCHS, M ;
WISCHMANN, HA ;
WAGNER, M ;
KRUGER, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 42 (04) :416-420