The mechanics of decompressive craniectomy: Personalized simulations

被引:37
作者
Weickenmeier, J. [1 ]
Butler, C. A. M. [2 ]
Young, P. G. [3 ]
Goriely, A. [4 ]
Kuhl, E. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Simpleware Ltd, Bradninch Hall,Castle St, Exeter EX4 3PL, Devon, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Math Inst, Oxford, England
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Neuromechanics; Neurosurgery; Finite element analysis; Decompressive craniectomy; Hemicraniectomy; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL; TISSUE; HEAD; ACCURATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2016.08.011
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Decompressive craniectomy is a traditional but controversial surgical procedure that removes part of the skull to allow an injured and swollen brain to expand outward. Recent studies suggest that mechanical strain is associated with its undesired, high failure rates. However, the precise strain fields induced by the craniectomy are unknown. Here we create a personalized craniectomy model from magnetic resonance images to quantify the strains during a decompressive craniectomy using finite element analysis. We swell selected regions of the brain and remove part of the skull to allow the brain to bulge outward and release the intracranical swelling pressure. Our simulations reveal three potential failure mechanisms associated with the procedure: axonal stretch in the center of the bulge, axonal compression at the edge of the craniectomy, and axonal shear around the opening. Strikingly, for a swelling of only 10%, axonal strain, compression, and shear reach local maxima of up to 30%, and exceed the reported functional and morphological damage thresholds of 18% and 21%. Our simulations suggest that a collateral craniectomy with the skull opening at the side of swelling is less invasive than a contralateral craniectomy with the skull opening at the opposite side: It induces less deformation, less rotation, smaller strains, and a markedly smaller midline shift. Our computational craniectomy model can help quantify brain deformation, tissue strain, axonal stretch, and shear with the goal to identify high-risk regions for brain damage on a personalized basis. While computational modeling is beyond clinical practice in neurosurgery today, simulations of neurosurgical procedures have the potential to rationalize surgical process parameters including timing, location, and size, and provide standardized guidelines for clinical decision making and neurosurgical planning. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 195
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, AB 6 14 AN US MAN SI
  • [2] Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury
    Bain, AC
    Meaney, DF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (06): : 615 - 622
  • [3] Budday S., 2016, MECH CHARACTER UNPUB
  • [4] Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation
    Budday, Silvia
    Nay, Richard
    de Rooij, Rijk
    Steinmann, Paul
    Wyrobek, Thomas
    Ovaert, Timothy C.
    Kuhl, Ellen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2015, 46 : 318 - 330
  • [5] The role of mechanics during brain development
    Budday, Silvia
    Steinmann, Paul
    Kuhl, Ellen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2014, 72 : 75 - 92
  • [6] Micromechanics of diffuse axonal injury: influence of axonal orientation and anisotropy
    Cloots, R. J. H.
    van Dommelen, J. A. W.
    Nyberg, T.
    Kleiven, S.
    Geers, M. G. D.
    [J]. BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2011, 10 (03) : 413 - 422
  • [7] Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury
    Cooper, D. James
    Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.
    Murray, Lynnette
    Arabi, Yaseen M.
    Davies, Andrew R.
    D'Urso, Paul
    Kossmann, Thomas
    Ponsford, Jennie
    Seppelt, Ian
    Reilly, Peter
    Wolfe, Rory
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (16) : 1493 - 1502
  • [8] Development of a geometrically accurate and adaptable finite element head model for impact simulation: the Naval Research Laboratory-Simpleware Head Model
    Cotton, R. T.
    Pearce, C. W.
    Young, P. G.
    Kota, N.
    Leung, A. C.
    Bagchi, A.
    Qidwai, S. M.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 19 (01) : 101 - 113
  • [9] Constitutive Modeling of Brain Tissue: Current Perspectives
    de Rooij, Rijk
    Kuhl, Ellen
    [J]. APPLIED MECHANICS REVIEWS, 2016, 68 (01)
  • [10] Biomechanics of traumatic brain injury
    El Sayed, Tamer
    Mota, Alejandro
    Fraternali, Fernando
    Ortiz, Michael
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 197 (51-52) : 4692 - 4701