Adsorption of chromate from aqueous solutions by HDTMA-modified clinoptilolite, glauconite and montmorillonite

被引:56
作者
Bajda, Tomasz [1 ]
Klapyta, Zenon [1 ]
机构
[1] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Geol Geophys & Environm Protect, Al Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Cr(VI); Adsorption; Chromate; Organo-silicates; Alkylammonium surfactants; SURFACTANT-MODIFIED CLAY; VARIEGATED SHALES; SORPTION; REMOVAL; CR(VI);
D O I
10.1016/j.clay.2013.10.005
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Adsorption of chromate on natural clinoptilolite (Cp), glauconite (Gl), and montmorillonite (Mt) treated with hexadecyl trimethylammonium (HDTMA) bromide at amounts equivalent to 1.0 and 2.0 of their cation-exchange capacities (CEC) was investigated by batch study. In the case of the Cp and Gl, adsorption of HDTMA took place on the zeolite and clay mineral surfaces only and thus relates to the external CEC (ECEC). The amount of chromate removed from the solution by the organo-silicates continuously decreased with increasing pH in the range 1.3-10. The highest values were obtained at pH between 1.3 and 6, and decreased rapidly above pH 6. At an initial chromate concentration of 625 mmol/L, its amounts bound to the Cp, Gl and Mt modified using 1.0 CEC loadings of the surfactant were 47, 102, and 168 mmol/kg, respectively. When amount of HDTMA used was equivalent to 2.0 CEC of the silicate, these values increased to 182, 240, and 285 mmol/kg, respectively. The results obtained suggest that the surfactant molecules, bound beyond the CEC to the external surfaces of the Cp and Gl, show a greater chromate adsorption ability in comparison with such molecules located in the interlayer spaces of the Mt. It is also evident that an excess of the surfactant, not adsorbed on the silicate surfaces, participated in the removal of chromate from the solution by formation of a precipitate of alkylammonium chromate. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ASTM (American Society for Testing And Materials), 1992, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[2]  
ATSDR, 2000, TOXICOLOGICAL PROFIL, P455
[3]  
Bajda T, 2006, MINERALOGIA POLONICA, V37, P109
[4]  
Bergaya F, 2006, DEV CLAY SCI, V1, P979, DOI 10.1016/S1572-4352(05)01036-6
[5]  
Bowman R.S., 2000, NATURAL ZEOLITES 3 M, P287
[6]   Applications of surfactant-modified zeolites to environmental remediation [J].
Bowman, RS .
MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2003, 61 (1-3) :43-56
[7]  
Bowman RS, 2001, PHYSICOCHEMICAL GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION, P161
[8]   SORPTION CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS ON HEXADECYLTRIMETHYLAMMONIUM-SMECTITE [J].
BOYD, SA ;
MORTLAND, MM ;
CHIOU, CT .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (03) :652-657
[9]   Arsenate and chromate removal with cationic surfactant-loaded and cation-exchanged clinoptilolite-rich tuff vs montmorillonite [J].
Chmielewská, E ;
Jesenák, K ;
Gáplovská, K .
COLLECTION OF CZECHOSLOVAK CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2003, 68 (04) :823-836
[10]  
Franus W, 1999, GEOL CARPATH, V50, P23