Comparison of electron beam computed tomography scanning and magnetic resonance imaging quantification of right ventricular mass: Validation with autopsy weights

Rationale and Objectives. We compared, in the same human hearts, the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and electron beam computed tomography (CT) scanning to accurately quantify the free wall and septal components of right ventricular (RV) mass. Methods. Eleven hearts extracted at autopsy were subjected to MR imaging and electron beam CT scanning in short-axis projections. Regression analyses of mass determinations obtained by manual planimetry MR imaging and electron beam CT scanning and autopsy weights were performed. Results. RV free wall mass by both MR imaging (53.4 +/- 19.1 g) and electron beam CT scanning (53.9 +/- 20.4 g) correlated well with autopsy weight (57.7 +/- 20.2 g). Regression analysis showed a strong correlation for MR imaging (r = .88, slope = .88, standard error the estimate [SEE] = 7.2 g, p < .001) and electron beam CT scanning (r = .95, slope = .95, SEE = 6.6 g, p < .001). RV septal mass by MR imaging (10.8 +/- 3.5 g) and electron beam CT scanning (7.1 +/- 2.4 g) correlated less well with the autopsy weight (12.5 +/- 6.5 g). Regression analysis showed a fair correlation for MR imaging (r = .45, slope = .83, SEE = 2.05 g, p = .001) and a poor correlation for electron beam CT scanning (r = .46, slope = .17, SEE = 2.25 g, p = .57). Conclusion. Both MR imaging and electron beam CT scanning accurately predict RV free wall mass but have difficulty predicting the septal component. Because the septal component constitutes only a small proportion of the total RV mass, determinations of RV mass should be based solely on the free wall component.