Durum wheat and barley productivity in saline-drought environments

被引:91
作者
Katerji, N. [2 ]
Mastrorilli, M. [1 ]
van Hoorn, J. W. [3 ]
Lahmer, F. Z. [4 ]
Hamdy, A. [4 ]
Oweis, T. [5 ]
机构
[1] CRA, Res Unit Cropping Syst Dry Environm, I-70125 Bari, Italy
[2] INRA, Unite Rech Environm & Grandes Cultures, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
[3] Wageningen Univ, Subdept Water Resources, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] CIHEAM Mediterranean Agron Inst Bari, I-70010 Valenzano, Italy
[5] ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria
关键词
Pre-dawn leaf water-potential; Actual evapotranspiration; Stomatal conductance; Water use efficiency; Soil salinity; SALT TOLERANCE ANALYSIS; WATER-STRESS; YIELD; GROWTH; CLASSIFICATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2009.01.003
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In two Successive years, durum wheat (Triticum turgidum Desf.) and barley (Hodeum vulgare L.) were tested in a factorial salinity-drought experiment, combining three levels of salinity and two levels of drought. The two drought treatments were obtained by applying irrigation water when the pre-dawn leaf water potential of the control treatments attained values of -0.4 and -0.7 MPa, respectively. This experiment led to the analysis of the effects of salinity, of drought, and of the drought-salinity interaction on the grain and straw yield of the two crops studied. Salinity affected the durum wheat by reducing the grain and straw yields when the soil salinity (ECe) was higher than 5.8 dS m(-1). This reduction was due to the fact that there were fewer grains per ear. As for barley, the grain yield was not reduced if ECe, ranged from 0.9 to 9.8 dS m(-1), but the straw yield was affected. The results obtained for durum and barley are consistent with the observations reported in the literature. Drought affected the plant water status of both species during the ear formation and flowering stages. It reduced the grain (37%) and straw (18%) yields. oil average, at the same rate for all salinity levels. These reductions were not related to the soil salinity levels. There were fewer eats per plant, explaining the decrease in crop productivity and water use efficiency in conditions of drought. Drought did not affect the relationship between soil salinity and relative yield. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Acevedo E., 1987, Drought tolerance in winter cereals. Proceedings of an international workshop, 27-31 October 1985, Capri, Italy, P303
[2]  
ALLISON LOWELL E., 1964, ADVANCE AGRON, V16, P139, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60023-1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SAS PROCEDURE GUIDE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1977, OPTIMIZING CROP PROD
[5]   Relationships between ash content, carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat [J].
Araus, JL ;
Amaro, T ;
Casadesús, J ;
Asbati, A ;
Nachit, MM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 25 (07) :835-842
[6]  
Ayers R.S., 1985, Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 29 Rev. 1, DOI DOI 10.1002/BIT.260271214
[7]   Using the CERES-Maize model in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Evaluation of model performance [J].
Ben Nouna, B ;
Katerji, N ;
Mastrorilli, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2000, 13 (04) :309-322
[8]   PHYSIOLOGY OF SALT TOLERANCE [J].
BERNSTEIN, L ;
HAYWARD, HE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1958, 9 :25-46
[9]  
CHEVERRY CI, 1995, CR ACAD AGR FR, V2, P42
[10]  
Fischer R. A., 1973, Proceedings of the Uppsala Symposium "Plant Response to Climatic Factors". September 1970. Uppsala, Sweden