Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial

被引:329
作者
Powell, Janet T. [1 ]
Sweeting, Michael J. [2 ]
Thompson, Matthew M. [3 ]
Ashleigh, Ray [4 ]
Bell, Rachel [5 ]
Gomes, Manuel [6 ]
Greenhalgh, Roger M. [7 ]
Grieve, Richard [6 ]
Heatley, Francine [7 ]
Hinchliffe, Robert J. [3 ]
Thompson, Simon G. [2 ]
Ulug, Pinar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London W6 8RP, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ London St Georges Hosp, London, England
[4] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Manchester M20 8LR, Lancs, England
[5] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, London SE1 9RT, England
[6] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London W6 8RP, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2014年 / 348卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MORTALITY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.f7661
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess whether a strategy of endovascular repair (if aortic morphology is suitable, open repair if not) versus open repair reduces early mortality for patients with suspected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting 30 vascular centres (29 UK, 1 Canadian), 2009-13. Participants 613 eligible patients (480 men) with a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm. Interventions 316 patients were randomised to the endovascular strategy (275 confirmed ruptures, 174 anatomically suitable for endovascular repair) and 297 to open repair (261 confirmed ruptures). Main outcome measures 30 day mortality, with 24 hour and in-hospital mortality, costs, and time and place of discharge as secondary outcomes. Results 30 day mortality was 35.4% (112/316) in the endovascular strategy group and 37.4% (111/297) in the open repair group: odds ratio 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.28; P=0.62); odds ratio after adjustment for age, sex, and Hardman index 0.94 (0.67 to 1.33). Women may benefit more than men (interaction test P=0.02) from the endovascular strategy: odds ratio 0.44 (0.22 to 0.91) versus 1.18 (0.80 to 1.75). 30 day mortality for patients with confirmed rupture was 36.4% (100/275) in the endovascular strategy group and 40.6% (106/261) in the open repair group (P=0.31). More patients in the endovascular strategy than in the open repair group were discharged directly to home (189/201 (94%) v 141/183 (77%); P<0.001). Average 30 day costs were similar between the randomised groups, with an incremental cost saving for the endovascular strategy versus open repair of 1186 pound ((sic)1420; $1939) (95% confidence interval -625 pound to 2997) pound. Conclusions A strategy of endovascular repair was not associated with significant reduction in either 30 day mortality or cost. Longer term cost effectiveness evaluations are needed to assess the full effects of the endovascular strategy in both men and women.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The Hardman index in patients operated on for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm:: a systematic review [J].
Acosta, Stefan ;
Ogren, Mats ;
Bergqvist, David ;
Lindblad, Bengt ;
Dencker, Magnus ;
Zdanowski, Zbigniew .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 44 (05) :949-954
[2]   Explaining the decrease in mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture [J].
Anjum, A. ;
von Allmen, R. ;
Greenhalgh, R. ;
Powell, J. T. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (05) :637-645
[3]   A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Bown, MJ ;
Sutton, AJ ;
Bell, PRF ;
Sayers, RD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (06) :714-730
[4]   Regional Disparities in Incidence, Handling and Outcomes of Patients with Symptomatic and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Norway [J].
Brattheim, B. J. ;
Eikemo, T. A. ;
Altreuther, M. ;
Landmark, A. D. ;
Faxvaag, A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 44 (03) :267-272
[5]  
Cuzick J, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P1017, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<1017::AID-SIM508>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-V
[7]   Association between sex and perioperative mortality following endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
De Rango, Paola ;
Lenti, Massimo ;
Cieri, Enrico ;
Simonte, Gioele ;
Cao, Piergiorgio ;
Richards, Toby ;
Manzone, Alessandra .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (06) :1684-1692
[8]   Endovascular suitability and outcome after open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Dick, F. ;
Diehm, N. ;
Opfermann, P. ;
von Allmen, R. ;
Tevaearai, H. ;
Schmidli, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (07) :940-947
[9]   National outcomes for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Comparison of open versus endovascular repairs [J].
Egorova, Natalia ;
Giacovelli, Jeannine ;
Greco, Giampaolo ;
Gelijns, Annetine ;
Kent, Craig K. ;
McKinsey, James F. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (05) :1092-1100
[10]   A CLASS OF K-SAMPLE TESTS FOR COMPARING THE CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF A COMPETING RISK [J].
GRAY, RJ .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1988, 16 (03) :1141-1154