Clean indoor air: Where, why, and how

被引:0
作者
Henson, R [1 ]
Medina, L
St Clair, S
Blanke, D
Downs, L
Jordan, J
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Off Smoking & Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Consumer Protect Div, Des Moines, IA USA
[3] William Mitchell Coll Law, Tobacco Law Project, St Paul, MN USA
[4] Med Soc New Jersey, Lawrenceville, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Clean indoor air policies are an effective way to eliminate exposure to secondhand smoke and reduce smoking among youth and adults; they are strongly recommended by the Surgeon General and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. How these policies are put into effect and at what level of government can make a difference. Legislation that preempts local action prevents communities from enacting more stringent laws or tailoring laws to address community-specific issues. Preemptive state laws also can be a barrier to local enforcement because communities not involved in decision making may be less aware of laws, may have no enforcement mechanism, and thus may be less compliant. Preemption is clearly a tobacco industry strategy to take away local control, usually in exchange for a weak law offering little protection from secondhand smoke. As communities across the country continue to pass stronger local ordinances, eliminating preemptive laws becomes more important. During 2002, Delaware became the first state to repeal clean air preemption. In Iowa, the attorney general's office has been involved in the determination of whether the state clean air law prevents communities from passing more stringent ordinances. And although Minnesota's pioneer Clean Indoor Air Act does not preempt local laws, the debate over preemption there has not ended but instead has taken new forms.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 82
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2001, FACTS AB SEC SMOK
[2]  
*AM NONSM RIGHTS F, 2002, US COMM LOC TOB CONT
[3]  
[Anonymous], NATL VITAL STAT REPO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Reducing tobacco use: A report of the surgeon general
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010, V2nd
[6]  
*CDCP, 1999, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V47, P1112
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, BEST PRACT COMPR TOB
[8]  
FERGUSON RN, 1987, COMMUNICATION 0527
[9]  
HEIRONIMUS J, 1992, IMPACT WORKPLACE RES, P1
[10]   Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure ao environmental tobacco smoke [J].
Hopkins, DP ;
Briss, PA ;
Ricard, CJ ;
Husten, CG ;
Carande-Rulis, VG ;
Fielding, JE ;
Alao, MO ;
McKenna, JW ;
Sharp, DJ ;
Harris, JR ;
Woollery, TA ;
Harris, KW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (02) :16-66