Pricing and equity in cross-regional green supply chains

被引:33
作者
Chen, Daqiang [1 ]
Ignatius, Joshua [2 ]
Sun, Danzhi [3 ]
Goh, Mark [4 ]
Zhan, Shalei [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Management & & Business, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Exeter, Business Sch, Exeter EX4 4PU, Devon, England
[3] Zhejiang Sci Res Inst Transport, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch & Logist Inst Asia Pacific, Singapore 119613, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pricing; Equity; Emission permits allocation; Cross-regional green supply chain; Cross border; NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM-MODEL; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; STEEL-INDUSTRY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; REDUCTION TARGETS; CO2; EMISSIONS; CHINA IRON; POLICY; ALLOCATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.059
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the problem of the firms operating on cross-border or inter-regional platforms that are subject to the enforcement of each local government's carbon emissions regulatory policy, thus causing an imbalance in the sharing of the burden of the greening of the total supply chain. We introduce the concept of equity as the incentive mechanism to coordinate this green supply chain which is a function of the carbon emission permits and the revenue generated by the firms. Due to the complexity and imbalance in the original incentive mechanism to this problem, we provide a new equivalent supply chain network equilibrium model under elastic demand based on user equilibrium theory. We state the user equilibrium conditions and provide the equivalent formulation. We show the trade-offs under various carbon emissions regulatory policies. A product with higher price elasticity and carbon emission intensity not only hampers the firm from gaining a higher revenue, but it also reduces the equity of the system under an invariant emission regulatory policy. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 987
页数:18
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Comparing emissions mitigation efforts across countries [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. ;
Pizer, William A. ;
Akimoto, Keigo .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2017, 17 (04) :501-515
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1956, Naval research logistics quarterly
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, BC ENV AFF REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1952, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, DOI [DOI 10.1680/IPEDS.1952.11362, DOI 10.1680/IPEDS.1952.11259]
[5]  
[Anonymous], TRANSP RES BOARD 88
[6]   Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? [J].
Arrow, KJ ;
Cropper, ML ;
Eads, GC ;
Hahn, RW ;
Lave, LB ;
Noll, RG ;
Portney, PR ;
Russell, M ;
Schmalensee, R ;
Smith, VK ;
Stavins, RN .
SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5259) :221-222
[7]   The distributionally robust newsvendor problem with dual sourcing under carbon tax and cap-and-trade regulations [J].
Bai, Qingguo ;
Chen, Mingyuan .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 98 :260-274
[8]   Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty [J].
Bernstein, F ;
Federgruen, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (01) :18-29
[9]   Beckmann's transportation network equilibrium model: Its history and relationship to the Kuhn-Tucker conditions [J].
Boyce, David .
ECONOMICS OF TRANSPORTATION, 2013, 2 (01) :47-52
[10]   URBAN-TRANSPORTATION NETWORK-EQUILIBRIUM AND DESIGN MODELS - RECENT ACHIEVEMENTS AND FUTURE-PROSPECTS [J].
BOYCE, DE .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1984, 16 (11) :1445-1474