Integrating biodiversity into intergovernmental fiscal transfers based on cantonal benchmarking:: a Swiss case study

被引:37
作者
Köllner, T
Schelske, O
Seidl, I
机构
[1] ETH Zentrum, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Environm Sci, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
biodiversity protection; biodiversity benchmarking; intergovernmental fiscal transfer; Switzerland; rarefaction method; economic incentives; spillover effects;
D O I
10.1078/1439-1791-00104
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Biodiversity is under major pressure, as are the substantial services it provides to society. Although the protection of biodiversity must be encouraged at different political and spatial levels, a particularly appropriate starting point is the regional level. In order to provide incentives for the relevant political bodies, it is proposed that biodiversity Should be considered in intergovernmental fiscal transfers. It is further suggested that these transfers are measured in line with the results of a biodiversity benchmarking exercise on plant species diversity in the various cantons. This biodiversity benchmarking is based on the species rarefaction method and a fitted power function. For the purpose of illustration, financial transfers are calculated. In this way, a Swiss transfer scheme that is currently under discussion is extended, and a biodiversity index that determines the transfer is introduced as an additional factor. It is shown that financial transfers change according to 1) the weighting of biodiversity and the minimum requirement for eligibility, 2) the size of the cantons, and 3) the influence of other structural particularities relevant to biodiversity. Hence, there is no single optimal solution; the way biodiversity is integrated into fiscal transfer will call for political and scientific deliberation. Such deliberation will also offer opportunities to better understand the role of fiscal policy in conservation policy.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 391
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.2307/1934145
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, PUBLIC FINANCE THEOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, VERBREITUNGSATLAS FA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J APPL ECOL
[5]   Species and area [J].
Arrhenius, O .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1921, 9 :95-99
[6]  
*BUWAL, 1998, SWISS LANDSC CONC
[7]  
*BUWAL, 1998, NAT BER SCHW UB BIOL
[8]   STATISTICS AND BIOLOGY OF THE SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP [J].
CONNOR, EF ;
MCCOY, ED .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1979, 113 (06) :791-833
[9]  
DAFFLON B, 1999, FISCAL FEDERALISM EU, P255
[10]   In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas [J].
Duelli, P ;
Obrist, MK .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1998, 7 (03) :297-309