Carbon reductions and health co-benefits from US residential energy efficiency measures

被引:25
|
作者
Levy, Jonathan I. [1 ]
Woo, May K. [1 ]
Penn, Stefani L. [1 ]
Omary, Mohammad [2 ]
Tambouret, Yann [3 ]
Kim, Chloe S. [1 ]
Arunachalam, Saravanan [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, 715 Albany St T4W, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Inst Environm, 100 Europa Dr Suite 490, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Res Comp Serv, 111 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
air pollution; energy efficiency; carbon dioxide; power plant; residential; public health; PARTICULATE MATTER; MORTALITY; OZONE; AIR; ALGORITHMS; SIMULATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The United States (US) Clean Power Plan established state-specific carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction goals for fossil fuel-fired electricity generating units (EGUs). States may achieve these goals through multiple mechanisms, including measures that can achieve equivalent CO2 reductions such as residential energy efficiency, which will have important co-benefits. Here, we develop state-resolution simulations of the economic, health, and climate benefits of increased residential insulation, considering EGUs and residential combustion. Increasing insulation to International Energy Conservation Code 2012 levels for all single-family homes in the US in 2013 would lead to annual reductions of 80 million tons of CO2 from EGUs, with annual co-benefits including 30 million tons of CO2 from residential combustion and 320 premature deaths associated with criteria pollutant emissions from both EGUs and residential combustion sources. Monetized climate and health co-benefits average $49 per ton of CO2 reduced from EGUs (range across states: $12-$390). State-specific co-benefit estimates can inform development of optimal Clean Power Plan implementation strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: Evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin
    Plantinga, AJ
    Wu, JJ
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (01) : 74 - 85
  • [22] Energy security and co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in three Asian countries
    Selvakkumaran, Sujeetha
    Limmeechokchai, Bundit
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 20 : 491 - 503
  • [23] Evaluating energy, health and carbon co-benefits from improved domestic space heating: A randomised community trial
    Preval, Nick
    Chapman, Ralph
    Pierse, Nevil
    Howden-Chapman, Philippa
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (08) : 3965 - 3972
  • [24] Blue carbon for climate and co-benefits
    Sarah E. Lester
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 967 - 968
  • [25] Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal
    Shree Raj Shakya
    S. Kumar
    Ram M. Shrestha
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2012, 17 : 77 - 101
  • [26] The co-benefits of carbon management on country
    Green, Donna
    Minchin, Liz
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (09) : 641 - 643
  • [27] Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal
    Shakya, Shree Raj
    Kumar, S.
    Shrestha, Ram M.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2012, 17 (01) : 77 - 101
  • [28] Effects of information and communication technology on total-factor carbon emission efficiency and the health co-benefits
    Linghu, Jingying
    Wojewodzki, Michal
    Cheong, Tsun Se
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 11
  • [29] Performance-based design of residential blocks for the co-benefits of building energy efficiency and outdoor thermal comfort improvement
    Xu, Shen
    Wang, Siyao
    Li, Gaomei
    Zhou, Haizhu
    Meng, Chong
    Qin, Yuchen
    He, Bao-Jie
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 264
  • [30] The co-benefits of carbon management on country
    Donna Green
    Liz Minchin
    Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2 : 641 - 643