Sepsis calculator for neonatal early onset sepsis - a systematic review and meta-analysis*

被引:39
作者
Deshmukh, Mangesh [1 ,3 ]
Mehta, Shailender [1 ,4 ]
Patole, Sanjay [2 ]
机构
[1] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Neonatol, 102-118 Murdoch Dr, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[2] King Edward Mem Hosp, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] St John God Subiaco Hosp, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Notre Dame, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Antibiotic usage; early-onset sepsis; neonates; preterm infant; sepsis calculator; ANTIBIOTIC EXPOSURE; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; LATE PRETERM; RISK; MANAGEMENT; NEWBORNS; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2019.1649650
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Over investigation and overuse of empirical antibiotics is a concern in management of neonatal early onset sepsis (EOS) using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. "Sepsis calculator" is a risk-based prediction model for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Objective: To compare outcomes of neonatal EOS using of sepsis calculator versus conventional approach. Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-RCTs reporting on outcomes after implementation of sepsis calculator for EOS for neonates >34-week gestation was conducted using the Cochrane methodology. Databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central library and Google Scholar were searched in May 2019. Primary outcomes were antibiotics usage and laboratory tests for managing EOS. Secondary outcomes included hospital admissions and readmissions, blood culture positive EOS and mortality. The level of evidence (LOE) was summarized using the GRADE guidelines. Results: A total of 387 articles were retrieved after initial search. Six high quality non-RCTs fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis (random effects model) showed that implementation of sepsis calculator was associated with reduced antibiotic usage [N = 172,385; OR = 0.22 (0.14-0.36); p < .00001; heterogeneity (I-2) = 97%, Number needed to treat (NNT): 22], laboratory tests [N = 168,432; OR = 0.14 (0.08-0.27); p < .00001; I-2 = 99%, NNT = 8], and admissions to neonatal unit [N = 16,628; OR = 0.24 (0.11-0.51); p = .0002; I-2 = 98%, NNT = 7]; LOE: moderate. There was no difference in mortality, culture positive EOS, and readmissions. Conclusion: Moderate quality evidence indicates that the implementation of a sepsis calculator was associated with reduced usage of antibiotics, laboratory tests and admission to neonatal unit with no increase in mortality and readmissions.
引用
收藏
页码:1832 / 1840
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Sepsis calculator implementation reduces empiric antibiotics for suspected early-onset sepsis [J].
Achten, Niek B. ;
Dorigo-Zetsma, J. Wendelien ;
van der Linden, Paul D. ;
van Brakel, Monique ;
Plotz, Frans B. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 177 (05) :741-746
[2]   Is early-onset sepsis risk calculator safe for the management of neonates born to mothers with chorioamnionitis? [J].
Aghai, Zubair H. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 38 (06) :769-770
[3]  
[Anonymous], ACT BACT COR SURV RE
[4]  
ARORA V, 2019, J NEONAT PERINAT MED
[5]   Implementation and Evaluation of the Early-Onset Sepsis Risk Calculator in a High-Risk University Nursery [J].
Beavers, Jessica B. ;
Bai, Shasha ;
Perry, Jennifer ;
Simpson, Jordan ;
Peeples, Sara .
CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2018, 57 (09) :1080-1085
[6]  
Bridges M, 2019, JOGNN-J OBST GYN NEO, V48, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.01.009
[7]   Neonatal Infectious Diseases Evaluation of Neonatal Sepsis [J].
Camacho-Gonzalez, Andres ;
Spearman, Paul W. ;
Stoll, Barbara J. .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 60 (02) :367-+
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2002, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V51, P1
[9]   Early and Late Onset Sepsis in Late Preterm Infants [J].
Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael ;
Moran, Cassandra ;
Benjamin, Daniel K. ;
Cotten, C. Michael ;
Clark, Reese H. ;
Benjamin, Daniel K., Jr. ;
Smith, P. Brian .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2009, 28 (12) :1052-1056
[10]  
Dhudasia Miren B, 2018, Hosp Pediatr, V8, P243, DOI 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0180