Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment

被引:58
作者
Lohmander, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
Lagergren, Jakob [2 ,3 ]
Roy, Pankaj G. [4 ]
Johansson, Hemming [5 ]
Brandberg, Yvonne [5 ]
Eriksen, Catharina [6 ,7 ]
Frisell, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Sect Breast Surg, Dept Breast & Endocrine Surg, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Capio St Goran Hosp, Breast Ctr, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Breast Surg, Oxford, England
[5] Karolinska Inst, Canc Ctr Karolinska, Dept Oncol Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Soder Sjukhuset, Sect Breast Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
acellular dermal matrix; ADM; breast cancer; breast reconstruction; complications; implants; randomized controlled trial; MASTECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003054
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes of using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) with implant based breast reconstructions (IBBRs) in a randomized controlled trial. A Summary Background Data: The use of ADMs in IBBRs is widespread, but link between ADM and complications remain a controversial topic. In view of reports concerning harm, we present 6-months safety data of ADM-assisted IBBR in the setting of breast cancer treatment. Methods: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial recruiting patients from 4 centers in Sweden and 1 in UK. Eligible were women with breast cancer planned for mastectomy with immediate IBBR. Participants were randomly allocated to IBBR with or without ADM (Strattice, Branchburg, NJ), with stratification by center in blocks of 6. Main primary endpoint was number of unplanned reoperations at 24 months, and safety expressed as the incidence of adverse events with a 6-month follow-up time for all participants. Analysis were done per protocol using Fisher exact test for complications and reoperations. Results: From start of enrolment on April 24, 2014, to close of trial on May 10, 2017, 135 women were enrolled, of whom 64 with ADM and 65 without ADM were included in the final analysis. Four patients (6%) in each group had reconstructive failure with implant loss, but IBBR with ADM exhibited a trend of more overall complications and reoperations (difference 0.16, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.32, P = 0.070), and with higher risk of wound healing problems (P = 0.013). Conclusions: With 6-months follow-up for all participants, immediate IBBR with ADM carried a risk of implant loss equal to conventional IBBR without ADM, but was associated with more adverse outcomes requiring surgical intervention. Further investigation of risk factors and patient selection in a long-term follow-up is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 841
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A Paradigm Shift in US Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates [J].
Albornoz, Claudia R. ;
Bach, Peter B. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
McCarthy, Colleen M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Matros, Evan .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (01) :15-23
[2]   Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre [J].
Barber, M. D. ;
Williams, L. ;
Anderson, E. D. C. ;
Neades, G. T. ;
Raine, C. ;
Young, O. ;
Kulkarni, D. ;
Young, I. ;
Dixon, J. M. .
EJSO, 2015, 41 (01) :100-105
[3]   One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implants A New Option for Immediate Reconstruction [J].
Cassileth, Lisa ;
Kohanzadeh, Som ;
Amersi, Farin .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (02) :134-138
[4]   Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and the Risk of Postoperative Complications [J].
Chun, Yoon S. ;
Verma, Kapil ;
Rosen, Heather ;
Lipsitz, Stuart ;
Morris, Donald ;
Kenney, Pardon ;
Eriksson, Elof .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (02) :429-436
[5]   Reducing implant loss rates in immediate breast reconstructions [J].
Darragh, L. ;
Robb, A. ;
Hardie, C. M. ;
McDonald, S. ;
Valand, P. ;
O'Donogue, J. M. .
BREAST, 2017, 31 :208-213
[6]   Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial [J].
Dikmans, Rieky E. G. ;
Negenborn, Vera L. ;
Bouman, Mark-Bram ;
Winters, Hay A. H. ;
Twisk, Jos W. R. ;
Ruhe, P. Quinten ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. ;
Smit, Jan Maerten ;
Tuinder, Stefania ;
Eltahir, Yassir ;
Posch, Nicole A. ;
van Steveninck-Barends, Josephina M. ;
Meesters-Caberg, Marleen A. ;
van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. ;
Ritt, Marco J. P. F. ;
Mullender, Margriet G. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02) :251-258
[7]   Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction:: a prospective study [J].
Elder, EE ;
Brandberg, Y ;
Björklund, T ;
Rylander, R ;
Lagergren, J ;
Jurell, G ;
Wickman, M ;
Sandelin, K .
BREAST, 2005, 14 (03) :201-208
[8]   BREAST RECONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING MASTECTOMY - A COMPARISON OF SUB-MUSCULAR AND SUBCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES [J].
GRUBER, RP ;
KAHN, RA ;
LASH, H ;
MASER, MR ;
APFELBERG, DB ;
LAUB, DR .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1981, 67 (03) :312-317
[9]   Surgical research or comic opera: Questions, but few answers [J].
Horton, R .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9007) :984-985
[10]  
Hunsicker Lisa M, 2017, Ann Plast Surg, V78, P35