Research as a Standard of Care in the PICU

被引:31
作者
Zimmerman, Jerry J. [1 ]
Anand, Kanwaljeet J. S. [2 ,3 ]
Meert, Kathleen L. [7 ]
Willson, Douglas F. [4 ,5 ]
Newth, Christopher J. L. [8 ]
Harrison, Rick [10 ]
Carcillo, Joseph A. [11 ]
Berger, John [9 ]
Jenkins, Tammara L. [12 ]
Nicholson, Carol [12 ]
Dean, J. Michael [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Seattle Childrens Hosp, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Le Bonheur Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Memphis, TN USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Childrens Hosp Richmond, Dept Pediat, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Charlottesville, VA USA
[6] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Childrens Hosp Michigan, Dept Pediat, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[8] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
[9] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[10] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pediat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[11] Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Dept Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[12] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Pediat Trauma & Crit Illness Branch, Bethesda, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
clinical research; clinically meaningful outcomes; equipoise; evidence-based medicine; iterative methodology; learning healthcare system; research ethics;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000000562
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Excellence in clinical care coupled with basic and applied research reflects the maturation of a medical subspecialty, advances that field, and provides objective data for identifying best practices. PICUs are uniquely suited for conducting translational and clinical research. In addition, multiple investigations have reported that a majority of parents are interested in their children's participation in clinical research, even when the research offers no direct benefit to their child. However, such activity may generate ethical conflict with bedside care providers trying to acutely identify the best approach for an individual critically ill child. Ultimately, this conflict may diminish enthusiasm for the generation of scientific evidence that supports the application of evidence-based medicine into PICU clinical standard work. Accordingly this review endeavors to provide an overview of current state PICU clinical research strengths, liabilities, opportunities, and barriers and contrast this with an established pediatric hematology-oncology iterative research model that constitutes a learning healthcare system. Data Sources, Data Extraction, and Data Synthesis: Narrative review of medical literature published in English. Conclusions: Currently, most PICU therapy is not evidence based. Developing a learning healthcare system in the PICU integrates clinical research into usual practice and fosters a culture of evidence-based learning and continual care improvement. As PICU mortality has significantly decreased, identification and validation of patient-centered, clinically relevant research outcome measures other than mortality is essential for future clinical trial design. Because most pediatric critical illness may be classified as rare diseases, participation in research networks will facilitate iterative, collaborative, multiinstitutional investigations that over time identify the best practices to improve PICU outcomes. Despite real ethical challenges, critically ill children and their families should have the opportunity to participate in translational/clinical research whenever feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:E13 / E21
页数:9
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Cook D., Brower R., Cooper J., Et al., Multicenter clinical research in adult critical care, Crit Care Med, 30, pp. 1636-1643, (2002)
[2]  
Juni P., Altman D.G., Egger M., Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials, BMJ, 323, pp. 42-46, (2001)
[3]  
Cook D.J., Sibbald W.J., Vincent J.L., Et al., Evidence based critical care medicine
[4]  
What is it and what can it do for us? Evidence Based Medicine in Critical Care Group, Crit Care Med, 24, pp. 334-337, (1996)
[5]  
Zijlstra J.G., Ligtenberg J.J., Girbes A.R., Randomized controlled trials in critical care medicine, JAMA, 300, (2008)
[6]  
Davis A.M., Hull S.C., Grady C., Et al., The invisible hand in clinical research: The study coordinator's critical role in human subjects protection, J Law Med Ethics, 30, pp. 411-419, (2002)
[7]  
Bernstein M., Conflict of interest: It is ethical for an investigator to also be the primary care-giver in a clinical trial, J Neurooncol, 63, pp. 107-108, (2003)
[8]  
Yanos P.T., Ziedonis D.M., The patient-oriented clinician-researcher: Advantages and challenges of being a double agent, Psychiatr Serv, 57, pp. 249-253, (2006)
[9]  
Tonelli M.R., Curtis J.R., Guntupalli K.K., Et al., An official multi-society statement: The role of clinical research results in the practice of critical care medicine, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 185, pp. 1117-1124, (2012)
[10]  
Olsen L.A., Aisner D., McGuinnis J.M., The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary, (2007)