共 50 条
HFpEF and HFrEF Display Different Phenotypes as Assessed by IGF-1 and IGFBP-1
被引:30
|作者:
Faxen, Ulrika Ljung
[1
,2
]
Hage, Camilla
[2
,3
]
Benson, Lina
[4
]
Zabarovskaja, Stanislava
[2
,3
]
Andreasson, Anna
[5
,6
]
Donal, Erwan
[7
]
Daubert, Jean-Claude
[7
]
Linde, Cecilia
[2
,3
]
Brismar, Kerstin
[8
,9
]
Lund, Lars H.
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Family Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Stockholm Univ, Stress Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Ctr Hosp Univ Rennes, Dept Cardiol & CIC IT U 804, Rennes, France
[8] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[9] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Metab & Diabet, Stockholm, Sweden
基金:
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词:
insulin-like growth factor 1;
insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1;
heart failure withpreserved ejection fraction;
biomarker;
FACTOR-BINDING PROTEIN-1;
GROWTH-FACTOR-I;
PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION;
CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE;
NATRIURETIC PEPTIDES;
ANABOLIC DEFICIENCY;
CIRCULATING LEVELS;
HEALTHY-SUBJECTS;
INSULIN;
HUMANS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.06.008
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Anabolic drive is impaired in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but insufficiently studied in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) mediates growth hormone effects and IGF binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) regulates IGF-1 activity. We tested the hypothesis that HFpEF and HFrEF are similar with regard to IGF-1 and IGFBP-1. Methods and Results: In patients with HFpEF (n = 79), HFrEF (n = 85), and controls (n = 136), we analyzed serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-1 concentrations, correlations, and associations with outcome. Age standardized scores of IGF-1 were higher in HFpEF, median arbitrary units (interquartile range); 1.21 (0.57-1.96) vs HFrEF, 0.09 (-1.40-1.62), and controls, 0.22 (-0.47-0.96), P overall <.001. IGFBP-1 was increased in HFpEF, 48 (28-79), and HFrEF, 65 (29-101), vs controls, 27(14-35) mu g/L, P overall <.001. These patterns persisted after adjusting for metabolic and HF severity confounders. IGF-1 was associated with outcomes in HFrEF, hazard ratio per natural logarithmic increase in IGF-1 SD score 0.51 (95% confidence interval 0.32-0.82, P =.005), but not significantly in HFpEF. IGFBP-1 was not associated with outcomes in either HFpEF nor HFrEF. Conclusion: HFpEF and HFrEF phenotypes were similar with regard to increased IGFBP-1 concentrations but differed regarding IGF-1 levels and prognostic role. HFrEF and HFpEF may display different impairment in anabolic drive.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 303
页数:11
相关论文