A Severe Sepsis Mortality Prediction Model and Score for Use With Administrative Data

被引:56
作者
Ford, Dee W. [1 ]
Goodwin, Andrew J. [1 ]
Simpson, Annie N. [2 ]
Johnson, Emily [2 ]
Nadig, Nandita [1 ]
Simpson, Kit N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Pulm Crit Care Allergy & Sleep Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Coll Hlth Profess, Dept Healthcare Leadership & Management, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
administrative data; critical care; health service research; intensive care; mortality prediction model; risk adjustment; sepsis; septic shock; severe sepsis; severity index; severity of illness; severity score; CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY; RISK PREDICTION; APACHE; SYSTEM; INDEX; VALIDATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000001392
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Administrative data are used for research, quality improvement, and health policy in severe sepsis. However, there is not a sepsis-specific tool applicable to administrative data with which to adjust for illness severity. Our objective was to develop, internally validate, and externally validate a severe sepsis mortality prediction model and associated mortality prediction score. Design: Retrospective cohort study using 2012 administrative data from five U.S. states. Three cohorts of patients with severe sepsis were created: 1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for severe sepsis/septic shock, 2) Martin approach, and 3) Angus approach. The model was developed and internally validated in International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, cohort and externally validated in other cohorts. Integer point values for each predictor variable were generated to create a sepsis severity score. Setting: Acute care, nonfederal hospitals in New York, Maryland, Florida, Michigan, and Washington. Subjects: Patients in one of three severe sepsis cohorts: 1) explicitly coded (n = 108,448), 2) Martin cohort (n = 139,094), and 3) Angus cohort (n = 523,637) Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Maximum likelihood estimation logistic regression to develop a predictive model for in-hospital mortality. Model calibration and discrimination assessed via Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit and C-statistics, respectively. Primary cohort subset into risk deciles and observed versus predicted mortality plotted. Goodness-of-fit demonstrated p value of more than 0.05 for each cohort demonstrating sound calibration. C-statistic ranged from low of 0.709 (sepsis severity score) to high of 0.838 (Angus cohort), suggesting good to excellent model discrimination. Comparison of observed versus expected mortality was robust although accuracy decreased in highest risk decile. Conclusions: Our sepsis severity model and score is a tool that provides reliable risk adjustment for administrative data.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   MORTALITY PROBABILITY-MODELS (MPM-II) BASED ON AN INTERNATIONAL COHORT OF INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS [J].
LEMESHOW, S ;
TERES, D ;
KLAR, J ;
AVRUNIN, JS ;
GEHLBACH, SH ;
RAPOPORT, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (20) :2478-2486
[22]   The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000 [J].
Martin, GS ;
Mannino, DM ;
Eaton, S ;
Moss, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (16) :1546-1554
[23]   Electronic Versus Manual Data Processing: Evaluating the Use of Electronic Health Records in Out-of-hospital Clinical Research [J].
Newgard, Craig D. ;
Zive, Dana ;
Jui, Jonathan ;
Weathers, Cody ;
Daya, Mohamud .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (02) :217-227
[24]   Proactive palliative care in the medical intensive care unit: Effects on length of stay for selected high-risk patients [J].
Norton, Sally A. ;
Hogan, Laura A. ;
Holloway, Robert G. ;
Temkin-Greener, Helena ;
Buckley, Marcia J. ;
Quill, Timothy E. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (06) :1530-1535
[25]   Charlson's weighted index of comorbidities is useful in assessing the risk of death in septic patients [J].
Oltean, Simona ;
Tatulescu, Doina ;
Bondor, Cosmina ;
Slavcovici, Adriana ;
Cismaru, Cristina ;
Lupse, Mihaela ;
Muntean, Monica ;
Jianu, Cristian ;
Marcu, Cristian ;
Oltean, Mihai .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 27 (04) :370-375
[26]   Acute renal failure in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock - a significant independent risk factor for mortality: results from the German Prevalence Study [J].
Oppert, Michael ;
Engel, Christoph ;
Brunkhorst, Frank-Martin ;
Bogatsch, Holger ;
Reinhart, Konrad ;
Frei, Ulrich ;
Eckardt, Kai-Uwe ;
Loeffler, Markus ;
John, Stefan .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 23 (03) :904-909
[27]   Sepsis Severity Score: An Internationally Derived Scoring System From the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Database [J].
Osborn, Tiffany M. ;
Phillips, Gary ;
Lemeshow, Stanley ;
Townsend, Sean ;
Schorr, Christa A. ;
Levy, Mitchell M. ;
Dellinger, R. Phillip .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (09) :1969-1976
[28]   Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets [J].
Paul, Prabasaj ;
Pennell, Michael L. ;
Lemeshow, Stanley .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (01) :67-80
[29]   Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: Costs simulation study [J].
Pavlovic, Ivan ;
Kern, Tomaz ;
Miklavcic, Damijan .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 30 (04) :300-316
[30]  
Poulose JT, 2009, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V179, pA4691