Health policy in South Australia 2003-10: primary health care workforce perceptions of the impact of policy change on health promotion

被引:22
作者
Jolley, Gwyn [1 ]
Freeman, Toby [1 ]
Baum, Fran [1 ]
Hurley, Catherine [1 ]
Lawless, Angela [1 ]
Bentley, Michael [1 ,4 ]
Labonte, Ronald [2 ]
Sanders, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Fac Hlth Sci, Southgate Inst Hlth Soc & Equ, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
[2] Univ Ottawa, Inst Populat Hlth, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Univ Western Cape, Sch Publ Hlth, ZA-7535 Bellville, South Africa
[4] Univ Tasmania, Sch Med, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
关键词
evaluation; health care reform; health policy; health promotion; primary health care;
D O I
10.1071/HE13088
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Issue addressed: This paper examines recent Australian health reform policies and considers how the primary health care (PHC) workforce experiences subsequent change and perceives its impact on health promotion practice. Methods: Health policy documents were analysed to determine their intended impact on health promotion. Interviews were conducted with 39 respondents from four State-funded PHC services to gain their perceptions of the impact of policy change on health promotion. Results: There have been a plethora of policy and strategy documents over the last decade relevant to PHC, and these suggest an intention to strengthen health promotion. However, respondents report that changes to the role and focus of PHC services have led to fewer opportunities for health promotion. Services are struggling to engage in health promotion activity, while funding and policy directions are prioritised to targeted, individual behaviour change. Conclusion: The experience of PHC workforce respondents in South Australia suggests that, despite policy intentions, health promotion practice is much reduced. Our research suggests that rigorous evaluation of health sector reforms should be undertaken to assess both intended and unintended outcomes in terms of service quality and delivery. So what? Health promoters are experiencing a contradictory policy and practice environment, and this research should assist health promoters in advocating for more government accountability in the implementation of policies in order to advance comprehensive PHC.?
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 124
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NATIONAL CHRONIC DIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Health Promotion, V1, pi
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT HLTH HOSP NETW A
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1978, INT C PRIM HLTH CAR
[5]  
Australian Government, 2008, GP SUPERCLINICS BETT
[6]  
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2010, BUILDING A 21ST CENT
[7]  
Australian Government National Health and Hospital Reform Commission, 2009, HLTH FUT ALL AUSTR F
[8]  
Australian Government Preventative Health Taskforce, 2009, AUSTRALIA THE HEALTH
[9]  
Australian Medical Association (South Australia) Inc, 2013, CONSULTATION SUBMISS
[10]  
Baum F., 2012, COMMUNITY HEALTH SER