Interval-Valued Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set Based Muirhead Mean for Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making

被引:15
作者
Krishankumar, R. [1 ]
Ravichandran, K. S. [1 ]
Ahmed, M. Ifjaz [1 ]
Kar, Samarjit [2 ]
Peng, Xindong [3 ]
机构
[1] SASTRA Univ, Sch Comp, Thanjavur 613401, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Math, Durgapur 713209, W Bengal, India
[3] Shaoguan Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shaoguan 512005, Peoples R China
关键词
group decision-making; hesitant fuzzy set; interval-valued probability; muirhead mean and programming model; SELECTION; OPERATORS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/math7040342
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
As a powerful generalization to fuzzy set, hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) was introduced, which provided multiple possible membership values to be associated with a specific instance. But HFS did not consider occurrence probability values, and to circumvent the issue, probabilistic HFS (PHFS) was introduced, which associates an occurrence probability value with each hesitant fuzzy element (HFE). Providing such a precise probability value is an open challenge and as a generalization to PHFS, interval-valued PHFS (IVPHFS) was proposed. IVPHFS provided flexibility to decision makers (DMs) by associating a range of values as an occurrence probability for each HFE. To enrich the usefulness of IVPHFS in multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM), in this paper, we extend the Muirhead mean (MM) operator to IVPHFS for aggregating preferences. The MM operator is a generalized operator that can effectively capture the interrelationship between multiple attributes. Some properties of the proposed operator are also discussed. Then, a new programming model is proposed for calculating the weights of attributes using DMs' partial information. Later, a systematic procedure is presented for MAGDM with the proposed operator and the practical use of the operator is demonstrated by using a renewable energy source selection problem. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal are discussed in comparison with other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Solar Power Plant Location Sites [J].
Aktas, Ahmet ;
Kabak, Mehmet .
ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 44 (08) :7235-7247
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1903, Proc. Eedinburgh Math. Soc., DOI DOI 10.1017/S001309150003460X
[3]   Hesitant Probabilistic Multiplicative Preference Relations in Group Decision Making [J].
Bashir, Zia ;
Rashid, Tabasam ;
Watrobski, Jaroslaw ;
Salabun, Wojciech ;
Malik, Abbas .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (03)
[4]   Multi-perspective strategic supplier selection in uncertain environments [J].
Chai, Junyi ;
Ngai, Eric W. T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 166 :215-225
[5]   A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY SELECTION USING Z-NUMBERS IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT [J].
Chatterjee, Kajal ;
Kar, Samarjit .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (02) :739-764
[6]   A Dynamic Reference Point Method for Emergency Response Under Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Environment [J].
Gao, Jie ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Liao, Huchang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 19 (05) :1261-1278
[7]   Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with an application to plant location selection based on a new extended VIKOR method [J].
Gupta, Pankaj ;
Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar ;
Grover, Nishtha .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 370 :184-203
[8]   Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set and its application in risk evaluation [J].
Hao, Zhinan ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Zhao, Hua ;
Su, Zhan .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 127 :16-28
[9]   Hesitant fuzzy dual Muirhead mean operators and its application to multiple attribute decision making [J].
Hong, Zhiyong ;
Rong, Yuan ;
Qin, Ya ;
Liu, Yi .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (02) :2161-2172
[10]   Multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with application to evaluate the transformation efficiency [J].
Jiang, Fangju ;
Ma, Qinggong .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (04) :953-965