Carbon capture and storage across fuels and sectors in energy system transformation pathways

被引:71
作者
Muratori, Matteo [1 ,3 ]
Kheshgi, Haroon [2 ]
Mignone, Bryan [2 ]
Clarke, Leon [1 ]
McJeon, Haewon [1 ]
Edmonds, Jae [1 ]
机构
[1] Joint Global Change Res Inst, Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, 5825 Univ Res Court, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[2] ExxonMobil Res & Engn Co, 1545 Route 22 East, Annandale, NJ 08801 USA
[3] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; CCS; Biofuels; Climate change mitigation; Energy systems; Transformation pathways; DIOXIDE CAPTURE; CO2; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is broadly understood to be a key mitigation technology, yet modeling analyses provide different results regarding the applications in which it might be used most effectively. Here we use the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) to explore the sensitivity of CCS deployment across sectors and fuels to future technology cost assumptions. We find that CCS is deployed preferentially in electricity generation or in liquid fuels production, depending on CCS and biofuels production cost assumptions. We consistently find significant deployment across both sectors in all of the scenarios considered here, with bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) often the dominant application. As such, this study challenges the view that CCS will primarily be coupled with power plants and used mainly in conjunction with fossil fuels, and suggests greater focus on practical implications of significant CCS and BECCS deployment to inform energy system transformation scenarios over the 21st century. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 41
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Akashi O., 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, P1
[2]   Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Update Review [J].
Alvarado, Vladimir ;
Manrique, Eduardo .
ENERGIES, 2010, 3 (09) :1529-1575
[3]   Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways [J].
Anex, Robert P. ;
Aden, Andy ;
Kazi, Feroz Kabir ;
Fortman, Joshua ;
Swanson, Ryan M. ;
Wright, Mark M. ;
Satrio, Justinus A. ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Daugaard, Daren E. ;
Platon, Alex ;
Kothandaraman, Geetha ;
Hsu, David D. ;
Dutta, Abhijit .
FUEL, 2010, 89 :S29-S35
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CO2 EM FUEL COMB
[7]  
Black and Veatch for U.S. Department of Energy-National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2012, COST PERF DATA POW G
[8]   Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets [J].
Calvin, Katherine ;
Wise, Marshall ;
Kyle, Page ;
Patel, Pralit ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Edmonds, Jae .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) :691-704
[9]   MODELING ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET [J].
CLARKE, JF ;
EDMONDS, JA .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1993, 15 (02) :123-129
[10]  
Clarke L., 2014, ASSESSING TRANSFORMA