Diagnostic accuracy of fasting plasma glucose as a screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
作者
Li, M. [1 ]
Lan, J-R [2 ]
Liang, J-L [3 ]
Xiong, X-L [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Huzhou Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Endocrine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Huzhou Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Nephrol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western Med Hosp Guan, Dept Endocrinol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Huzhou First Hosp, Int Branch, Dept Gynecol, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Fasting plasma glucose; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Meta-analysis; Validation studies; BODY-MASS INDEX; 1ST PRENATAL VISIT; CHALLENGE TEST; TRIMESTER; PREDICTION; SENSITIVITY; ADIPONECTIN; POPULATION; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.26355/eurrev_202011_23605
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is suggested as a potential screening test for further confirmatory testing by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The diagnostic accuracy of FPG has been investigated in several studies with varying results. This meta-analysis is done to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FPG for the screening of GDM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search for all studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of FPG with OGTT as the reference standard in the databases of Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase from inception till January 2020. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 tool was used to assess the quality of trials. RESULTS: 29 studies with 74.481 patients were included. Eleven studies used the cut-off values of 92mg/dl for FPG to diagnose GDM, whereas 10 studies used the value of 92 mg/dl. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FPG for cutoff a92 mg/dl was 68.6% (95% CI: 51.8%-81.9%), and 93.2% (95% CI: 80.5%-97.8%) respectively. The AUC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79-0.94). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FPG for cutoff >= 90 mg/dl was 58.5% (95% CI: 41.1%-73.9%), and 89.2% (95% CI: 78.5%-94.9%) respectively. The AUC was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91). The overall quality of studies was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: To summarize, our study found that FPG may have a role in the screening of GDM among pregnant women with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity at a cut-off of 92 mg/dl. Further studies exploring its accuracy in different ethnic populations in reference to a standard OGTT are required to strengthen the evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:11172 / 11186
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Gestational diabetes in a high-risk population: using the fasting plasma glucose to simplify the diagnostic algorithm [J].
Agarwal, MM ;
Dhatt, GS ;
Punnose, J ;
Koster, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 120 (01) :39-44
[2]   Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Using the Fasting Plasma Glucose Level to Simplify the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Diagnostic Algorithm in an Adult South Asian Population [J].
Agarwal, Mukesh M. ;
Punnose, John ;
Sukhija, Komal ;
Sharma, Asha ;
Choudhary, Naimaa K. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2018, 42 (05) :500-504
[3]   Gestational diabetes screening: The low-cost algorithm [J].
Agarwal, Mukesh M. ;
Weigl, Bernhard ;
Hod, Moshe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 115 :S30-S33
[4]   Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Simplifying the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy diagnostic algorithm using fasting plasma glucose [J].
Agarwal, Mukesh M. ;
Dhatt, Gurdeep S. ;
Shah, Syed M. .
DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (09) :2018-2020
[5]   Accuracy of glycosuria, random blood glucose and risk factors as selective screening tools for gestational diabetes mellitus in comparison with universal diagnosing [J].
Agbozo, Faith ;
Abubakari, Abdulai ;
Narh, Clement ;
Jahn, Albrecht .
BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2018, 6 (01)
[7]   Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 :S137-S143
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Global report on psoriasis
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2000, INT J GYNAECOL OBSTE
[10]  
Aravind RS, 2017, Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res, V4, P66