The Prevalence and Magnitude of Impaired Cutaneous Sensation across the Hand in the Chronic Period Post-Stroke

被引:11
作者
Bowden, Jocelyn L. [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Gaven G. [1 ]
McNulty, Penelope A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Res Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 08期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
SINGLE TACTILE AFFERENTS; FORCE CONTROL; SENSORY LOSS; STROKE; GRIP; AGE; DISCRIMINATION; DEXTERITY; RECOVERY; ARM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0104153
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sensation is commonly impaired immediately post-stroke but little is known about the long-term changes in cutaneous sensation that have the capacity to adversely impact independence and motor-function. We investigated cutaneous sensory thresholds across the hand in the chronic post-stroke period. Cutaneous sensation was assessed in 42 community-dwelling stroke patients and compared to 36 healthy subjects. Sensation was tested with calibrated monofilaments at 6 sites on the hand that covered the median, ulnar and radial innervation territories and included both glabrous (hairless) and hairy skin. The motor-function of stroke patients was assessed with the Wolf Motor Function Test and the upper-limb motor Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Impaired cutaneous sensation was defined as monofilament thresholds >3 SD above the mean of healthy subjects and good sensation was <= 3 SD. Cutaneous sensation was impaired for 33% of patients and was 40-84% worse on the more-affected side compared to healthy subjects depending on the site (p<0.05). When the stroke patient data were pooled cutaneous sensation fell within the healthy range, although similar to 1/3 of patients were classified with impaired sensation. Classification by motor-function revealed low levels of impaired sensation. The magnitude of sensory loss was only apparent when the sensory-function of stroke patients was classified as good or impaired. Sensation was most impaired on the dorsum of the hand where age-related changes in monofilament thresholds are minimal in healthy subjects. Although patients with both high and low motor-function had poor cutaneous sensation, overall patients with low motor-function had poorer cutaneous sensation than those with higher motor-function, and relationships were found between motor impairments and sensation at the fingertip and palm. These results emphasize the importance of identifying the presence and magnitude of cutaneous sensory impairments in the chronic period after stroke.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] Broeks JG, 1999, DISABIL REHABIL, V21, P357
  • [12] Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke
    Buma, Floor
    Kwakkel, Gert
    Ramsey, Nick
    [J]. RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 31 (06) : 707 - 722
  • [13] Carey L., 1995, CRIT REV PHYS REHABI, V7, P51, DOI [DOI 10.1615/CRITREVPHYSREHABILMED.V7.I1.40, 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v7.i1.40]
  • [14] FREQUENCY OF DISCRIMINATIVE SENSORY LOSS IN THE HAND AFTER STROKE IN A REHABILITATION SETTING
    Carey, Leeanne M.
    Matyas, Thomas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (03) : 257 - 263
  • [15] Impaired touch discrimination after stroke: A quantitative test
    Carey, LM
    Oke, LE
    Matyas, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC REHABILITATION, 1997, 11 (04): : 219 - 232
  • [16] Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery
    Connell, L. A.
    Lincoln, N. B.
    Radford, K. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 22 (08) : 758 - 767
  • [17] Measures of sensation in neurological conditions: a systematic review
    Connell, L. A.
    Tyson, S. F.
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 26 (01) : 68 - 80
  • [18] de Weerdt W, 1987, Int J Rehabil Res, V10, P110, DOI 10.1097/00004356-198712005-00022
  • [19] DEUSCHL G, 1995, EXP BRAIN RES, V105, P138
  • [20] Evidence for strong synaptic coupling between single tactile afferents from the sole of the foot and motoneurons supplying leg muscles
    Fallon, JB
    Bent, LR
    McNulty, PA
    Macefield, VG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 94 (06) : 3795 - 3804