Estimating the Safety Effects of Intersection Sight Distance at Unsignalized Intersections

被引:5
作者
Himes, Scott [1 ]
Eccles, Kim [1 ]
Peach, Kara [1 ]
Monsere, Christopher M. [2 ]
Gates, Timothy J. [3 ]
机构
[1] VHB, 4000 WestChase Blvd,Suite 530, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Maseeh Coll Engn & Comp Sci, POB 751, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn, Engn 3573, 428 South Shaw Lane, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Roads and streets;
D O I
10.3141/2588-08
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A gap acceptance crash is one of the most common types of multivehicle crashes at unsignalized intersections. Drivers' gap acceptance is influenced by the intersection sight distance (ISD). Before this research, the relationship between ISD and safety (measured by crash frequency) at unsignalized intersections was not quantified. To establish this relationship, crash, traffic, and geometric data were collected from 832 two-lane minor unsignalized intersection approaches in North Carolina, Ohio, and Washington State. These intersections represent a range of volumes and major road geometrics (two-lane and four-lane undivided and divided) in urban and rural areas. The sites were selected for data collection independent of historical crash frequency. The data collection included field-measured ISD using a standardized method and an exploratory measure of ISD quality. For analysis of the data, a cross-sectional study design was used to quantify the relationship between safety and ISD. The results suggest that target crashes and target fatal and injury crashes are associated with available ISD, and ISD quality is related to safety performance. Moreover, the results suggest that the impact of ISD on target crashes and target fatal and injury crashes varies as a function of the major and minor road traffic volumes.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Agent K., 1996, Research Report No. KTC-96-13
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, POL GEOM DES HIGHW S
[3]  
Eccles K., 2012, FHWAHRT11040 US DEP
[4]  
FITZPATRICK K, 2000, 440 NCHRP TRB NAT RE
[5]  
Golembiewski G. A., 2011, FHWASA1108FHWA US DE
[6]  
Harwood D.W., 2000, Report No. FHWA-RD- 99-207
[7]  
Hauer E., 2015, ART REGRESSION MODEL, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12529-9
[8]  
Kohlman Rabbani E.R, 2003, 500 NCHRP TRANSP RES
[9]  
Mitchell R., 1972, PUBLIC WORKS, V103, P75