Intercycle variability of the ovarian response in patients undergoing repeated stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol

被引:28
作者
Rombauts, Luk [1 ,2 ]
Lambalk, Cornelis B. [3 ]
Schultze-Mosgau, Askan [4 ]
van Kuijk, Jacqueline [5 ]
Verweij, Pierre [5 ]
Gates, Davis [6 ]
Gordon, Keith [6 ]
Griesinger, Georg [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[2] Monash IVF, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Clin Schleswig Holstein, Dept Reprod Med & Gynecol Endocrinol, Lubeck, Germany
[5] MSD Oss NV, Oss, Netherlands
[6] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
关键词
Corifollitropin alfa; GnRH antagonist; repeated ovarian stimulation; ovarian response; controlled ovarian stimulation; CONSECUTIVE CYCLES; HYPERSTIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether individual subject variation in ovarian response between repeated cycles with the same ovarian stimulation protocol can be predicted. Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial. Patient(s): Women aged 18-39 from a phase 3, open-label, uncontrolled trial with complete data across all cycles (n = 176). Intervention(s): Up to three cycles of a single injection of 150 mu g corifollitropin alfa for 7 days, then daily recombinant FSH/hMG until three follicles reached >= 17 mm. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist from stimulation day 5 until day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG in cycles 1-3, transition in ovarian response type between cycles from low (0-< 6), normal (6-<18), and high (>= 18), and serum FSH concentrations and antral follicle count (AFC) at each cycle start. Result(s): The mean (SD) numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG were 13.4 (6.2), 13.3 (5.4), and 13.8 (6.4) in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Between cycles 1 and 2, 11.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 12.5% switched from low or high to normal response; 75.6% remained in the same category. Between cycles 2 and 3, 15.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 10.2% switched from low or high to normal response; 73.9% remained in the same category. These shifts are symmetrical in nature, in that the percentage of subjects who shift from normal to low or high response is comparable to the percentage of subjects who shift from low or high to normal response. Baseline FSH and AFC did not significantly predict transition in ovarian response. Conclusion(s): The variability in ovarian responses between repeated cycles using the same protocol was not explained by baseline FSH and AFC. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
    Broekmans, F. J.
    Kwee, J.
    Hendriks, D. J.
    Mol, B. W.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2006, 12 (06) : 685 - 718
  • [2] Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
    Broekmans, Frank J.
    Verweij, Pierre J. M.
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    Mannaerts, Bernadette M. J. L.
    Witjes, Han
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (08) : 1688 - 1697
  • [3] AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis
    Broer, S. L.
    Dolleman, M.
    Opmeer, B. C.
    Fauser, B. C.
    Mol, B. W.
    Broekmans, F. J. M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [4] Consecutive cycles in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
    Doldi, N
    Persico, P
    de Santis, L
    Rabellotti, E
    Papaleo, E
    Ferrari, A
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 20 (03) : 132 - 136
  • [5] OVARIAN RESPONSE IN CONSECUTIVE CYCLES OF OVARIAN STIMULATION IN NORMALLY OVULATING WOMEN
    EBBIARY, NAA
    MORGAN, C
    MARTIN, K
    AFNAN, M
    NEWTON, JR
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (03) : 536 - 543
  • [6] Ovarian response in three consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles
    Hoveyda, F
    Engmann, L
    Steele, J
    Bernal, AL
    Barlow, DH
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (04) : 706 - 710
  • [7] Repeated ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in patients in a GnRH antagonist protocol: no concern for immunogenicity
    Norman, Robert J.
    Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
    Salle, Bruno S.
    Elbers, Jolanda
    Heijnen, Esther
    Marintcheva-Petrova, Maya
    Mannaerts, Bernadette
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (08) : 2200 - 2208
  • [8] Consecutive gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles: does the elapsed time interval between successive treatments affect outcomes?
    Reichman, David E.
    Chung, Pak
    Meyer, Laura
    Greenwood, Eleni
    Davis, Owen
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (05) : 1277 - 1282
  • [10] Comparative incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH
    Tarlatzis, Basil C.
    Griesinger, Georg
    Leader, Arthur
    Rombauts, Luk
    IJzerman-Boon, Pieta C.
    Mannaerts, Bernadette M. J. L.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 24 (04) : 410 - 419