Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) Screening for colorectal cancer

被引:0
作者
Arditi, C. [1 ,2 ]
Peytremann-Bridevaux, I. [1 ,2 ]
Bumand, B. [3 ]
Eckardt, V. F. [3 ]
Bytzer, P. [4 ,5 ]
Agreus, L. [6 ]
Dubois, R. W. [4 ,5 ]
Vader, J. -P. [3 ]
Froehlich, F. [2 ,7 ,8 ]
Pittet, V. [4 ,5 ]
Filliettaz, S. Schussele [1 ,2 ]
Juillerat, P. [2 ,7 ]
Convers, J. -J. [3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Vaudois, Healthcare Evaluat Unit, Inst Social & Prevent Med IUMSP, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Deutsch Klin Diagnost, Dept Gastroenterol, D-6200 Wiesbaden, Germany
[4] Koge Univ Hosp, Dept Med Gastroenterol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Karolinska Inst, Ctr Family & Community Med, Huddinge, Sweden
[7] CHU Vaudois, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[8] Univ Basel, Dept Gastroenterol, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
FECAL-OCCULT-BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; AVERAGE-RISK POPULATION; BASE-LINE FINDINGS; FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY; COLON-CANCER; ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; FOLLOW-UP; 1ST-DEGREE RELATIVES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1224516
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: To summarize the published literature on assessment of appropriateness of colonoscopy for screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in asymptomatic individuals without personal history of CRC or polyps, and report appropriateness criteria developed by an expert panel, the 2008 European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, EPAGEII. Methods: A systematic search Of guidelines, systematic reviews, and primary Studies regarding colonoscopy for screening for colorectal cancer was performed. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was applied to develop appropriateness criteria for colonoscopy in these circumstances. Results: Available evidence for CRC screening comes from small case-controlled Studies, with heterogeneous results, and from indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fecal Occult blood test (FOBT) screening and studies on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. Most guidelines recommend screening colonoscopy every 10 years starting at age 50 in average-risk individuals. In individuals with a higher risk of CRC due to family history, there is a consensus that it is appropriate to offer screening colonoscopy at < 50years. EPAGEII considered screening colonoscopy appropriate above 50 years in aver age-risk individuals. Panelists deemed screening colonoscopy appropriate for younger patients, with shorter Surveillance intervals, where family or personal risk of colorectal cancer is higher. A positive FOBT or the discovery of adenomas at sigmoidoscopy are considered appropriate indications. Conclusions: Despite the lack of evidence based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), colonoscopy is recommended by Most published guidelines and EPAGEII criteria available online (http://www.epage.ch), as a screening option for CRC in individuals at average risk of CRC, and undisputedly as the main screening tool for CRC in individuals at moderate and high risk of CRC.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 125
页数:9
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening:: A prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin colonoscopy project 1, BECOP 1) [J].
Adler, Andreas ;
Roll, Stephanie ;
Marowski, Bernhard ;
Drossel, Rolf ;
Rehs, Hans-Ulrich ;
Willich, Stefan N. ;
Riese, Jutta ;
Wiedenmann, Bertram ;
Roesch, Thomas .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (10) :1628-1638
[2]   Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics [J].
Allison, James E. ;
Sakoda, Lori C. ;
Levin, Theodore R. ;
Tucker, Jo P. ;
Tekawa, Irene S. ;
Cuff, Thomas ;
Pauly, Mary Pat ;
Shlager, Lyle ;
Palitz, Albert M. ;
Zhao, Wei K. ;
Schwartz, J. Sanford ;
Ransohoff, David F. ;
Selby, Joseph V. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (19) :1462-1470
[3]   A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening [J].
Allison, JE ;
Tekawa, IS ;
Ransom, LJ ;
Adrain, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (03) :155-159
[4]   Predictors of proximal neoplasia in patients without distal adenomatous pathology [J].
Anderson, JC ;
Alpern, Z ;
Messina, CR ;
Lane, B ;
Hubbard, P ;
Grimson, R ;
Ells, PF ;
Brand, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (03) :472-477
[5]  
[Anonymous], COL CANC SCREEN CLIN
[6]  
*ASTR CANC NETW CO, 2005, GUID PREV EARL DET M
[7]   Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Cook, CF ;
Cuzick, J ;
Edwards, R ;
Northover, JMA ;
Wardle, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9314) :1291-1300
[8]   Design of a multicentre randomised trial to evaluate flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Edwards, R ;
Wardle, J ;
Northover, JMA ;
Sutton, S ;
Hart, AR ;
Williams, CB ;
Cuzick, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2001, 8 (03) :137-144
[9]   Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, PS ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (02) :129-131
[10]   Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients [J].
Bertario, L ;
Russo, A ;
Sala, P ;
Pizzetti, P ;
Ballardini, G ;
Andreola, S ;
Spinelli, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 105 (01) :82-87