Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

被引:42
作者
Morra, Lia [1 ]
Sacchetto, Daniela [1 ]
Durando, Manuela [2 ,3 ]
Agliozzo, Silvano [1 ]
Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro [4 ]
Delsanto, Silvia [1 ]
Pesce, Barbara [5 ]
Persano, Diego [1 ]
Mariscotti, Giovanna [2 ,3 ]
Marra, Vincenzo [6 ]
Fonio, Paolo [2 ,3 ]
Bert, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Im3D, Dept Res & Dev, I-10153 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Radiol, Turin, Italy
[3] Radiol Univ Torino, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Radiat Therapy, Azienda Osped Univ Citta Salute & Sci Torino, Turin, Italy
[4] IRCCS Policlin S Donato, Unita Radiol, Milan, Italy
[5] CdC Paideia, Rome, Italy
[6] St Anna Hosp, Dept Radiol, Turin, Italy
关键词
SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; DENSITY; CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2015141959
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate a commercial tomosynthesis computer-aided detection (CAD) system in an independent, multicenter dataset. Materials and Methods: Diagnostic and screening tomosynthesis mammographic examinations (n = 175; cranial caudal and mediolateral oblique) were randomly selected from a previous institutional review board-approved trial. All subjects gave informed consent. Examinations were performed in three centers and included 123 patients, with 132 biopsy-proven screening-detected cancers, and 52 examinations with negative results at 1-year follow-up. One hundred eleven lesions were masses and/or microcalcifications (72 masses, 22 microcalcifications, 17 masses with microcalcifications) and 21 were architectural distortions. Lesions were annotated by radiologists who were aware of all available reports. CAD performance was assessed as per-lesion sensitivity and false-positive results per volume in patients with negative results. Results: Use of the CAD system showed per-lesion sensitivity of 89% (99 of 111; 95% confidence interval: 81%, 94%), with 2.7 +/- 1.8 false-positive rate per view, 62 of 72 lesions detected were masses, 20 of 22 were microcalcification clusters, and 17 of 17 were masses with microcalcifications. Overall, 37 of 39 microcalcification clusters (95% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval: 81%, 99%) and 79 of 89 masses (89% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval: 80%, 94%) were detected with the CAD system. On average, 0.5 false-positive rate per view were microcalcification clusters, 2.1 were masses, and 0.1 were masses and microcalcifications. Conclusion: A digital breast tomosynthesis CAD system can allow detection of a large percentage (89%, 99 of 111) of breast cancers manifesting as masses and microcalcification clusters, with an acceptable false-positive rate (2.7 per breast view). Further studies with larger datasets acquired with equipment from multiple vendors are needed to replicate the findings and to study the interaction of radiologists and CAD systems. (C) RSNA, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: Sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion [J].
Baker, JA ;
Rosen, EL ;
Lo, JY ;
Gimenez, EI ;
Welsh, R ;
Soo, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (04) :1083-1088
[2]   Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time [J].
Bernardi, D. ;
Ciatto, S. ;
Pellegrini, M. ;
Anesi, V. ;
Burlon, S. ;
Cauli, E. ;
Depaoli, M. ;
Larentis, L. ;
Malesani, V. ;
Targa, L. ;
Baldo, P. ;
Houssami, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1020) :E1174-E1178
[3]  
Bernardi D, 2012, RADIOL MED, V117, P519, DOI 10.1007/s11547-011-0777-3
[4]   Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer [J].
Brem, RF ;
Hoffmeister, JW ;
Rapelyea, JA ;
Zisman, G ;
Mohtashemi, K ;
Jindal, G ;
DiSimio, MP ;
Rogers, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (02) :439-444
[5]   Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: Comparison of three approaches [J].
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Wei, Jun ;
Zhang, Yiheng ;
Helvie, Mark A. ;
Moore, Richard H. ;
Sahiner, Berkman ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Kopans, Daniel B. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) :4087-4095
[6]  
Ciatto Stefano, 2004, Radiol Med, V107, P480
[7]   Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Caumo, Francesca ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Brunelli, Silvia ;
Tuttobene, Paola ;
Bricolo, Paola ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Montemezzi, Stefania ;
Macaskill, Petra .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) :583-589
[8]   Addition of Tomosynthesis to Conventional Digital Mammography: Effect on Image Interpretation Time of Screening Examinations [J].
Dang, Pragya A. ;
Freer, Phoebe E. ;
Humphrey, Kathryn L. ;
Halpern, Elkan F. ;
Rafferty, Elizabeth A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (01) :49-56
[9]   Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography [J].
Friedewald, Sarah M. ;
Rafferty, Elizabeth A. ;
Rose, Stephen L. ;
Durand, Melissa A. ;
Plecha, Donna M. ;
Greenberg, Julianne S. ;
Hayes, Mary K. ;
Copit, Debra S. ;
Carlson, Kara L. ;
Cink, Thomas M. ;
Barke, Lora D. ;
Greer, Linda N. ;
Miller, Dave P. ;
Conant, Emily F. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (24) :2499-2507
[10]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Utilization in the United States: A Survey of Physician Members of the Society of Breast Imaging [J].
Hardesty, Lara A. ;
Kreidler, Sarah M. ;
Glueck, Deborah H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (06) :594-599