Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects

被引:48
作者
Mucedero, Manuela
Baccetti, Tiziano [1 ]
Franchi, Lorenzo [1 ]
Cozza, Paola [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Orthodont, I-50127 Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Orthodont, Rome, Italy
关键词
MALOCCLUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of this cephalometric study was to analyze the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and facemask (FM), or FM combined with bite block (BB), on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in subjects with Class III malocclusion when compared with an untreated Class III control group. Methods: Thirty-nine subjects (22 girls, 17 boys) were divided into 2 groups: the FM/BB group (22 subjects; mean ages, 8.9 years +/- 1.5 before treatment and 10.5 years +/- 1.3 after treatment) and the RME/FM group (17 subjects; mean ages, 7.1 years +/- 1.8 before treatment and 9.2 years +/- 1.8 after treatment). The treated groups were compared with an untreated Class III control group of 20 subjects (mean ages, 8.1 years +/- 1.2 at the first observation and 10 years +/- 1.7 at the second observation). All subjects were at prepubertal stage of skeletal maturity at both times. Comparisons of these changes between the 3 groups were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks with post-hoc tests. Results: The favorable skeletal maxillary and mandibular changes produced by maxillary protraction with or without RME were not associated with significant changes in the sagittal oropharygeal and nasopharyngeal airway dimensions. Conclusions: Orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusion does not produce a significant increase in airway dimensions in the short term. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:777-81)
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 781
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Baccetti T, 2005, Seminars in Orthodontics, V11, P119, DOI [10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005, DOI 10.1053/J.SODO.2005.04.005, 10.1053/J.SODO.2005.04.005]
[2]   Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion - A systematic review [J].
De Toffol, Laura ;
Pavoni, Chiara ;
Baccetti, Tiziano ;
Franchi, Lorenzo ;
Cozza, Paola .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (03) :561-573
[3]  
HANDELMAN CS, 1976, ANGLE ORTHOD, V46, P243
[4]  
Hiyama S, 2002, ANGLE ORTHOD, V72, P43
[5]   Effects on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions of protraction and rapid palatal expansion in Class III malocclusion subjects [J].
Kilinc, Ali Serdar ;
Arslan, Seher Gunduz ;
Kama, Jalen Devecioglu ;
Ozer, Torun ;
Dari, Osman .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2008, 30 (01) :61-66
[6]   A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POSTERIOR NASOPHARYNGEAL WALL BETWEEN 3 AND 16 YEARS OF AGE [J].
LINDERARONSON, S ;
LEIGHTON, BC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1983, 5 (01) :47-58
[7]  
Martin O., 2006, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V130, p436.
[8]   A METHOD OF CEPHALOMETRIC EVALUATION [J].
MCNAMARA, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1984, 86 (06) :449-469
[9]   Maxillary protraction appliance effect on the size of the upper airway passage [J].
Oktay, Huesamettin ;
Ulukaya, Esenguel .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (02) :209-214
[10]   Sagittal airway dimensions following maxillary protraction: a pilot study [J].
Sayinsu, K ;
Isik, F ;
Arun, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2006, 28 (02) :184-189