Ranking efficiency units in DEA using bootstrapping an applied analysis for Slovenian farm data

被引:33
作者
Gocht, Alexander
Balcombe, Kelvin
机构
[1] Fed Agr Res Ctr, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
关键词
data envelopment analysis; bootstrapping; agriculture; technical efficiency; confidence intervals; slice DEA model; GAMS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00155.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article explores how data envelopment analysis (DEA), along with a smoothed bootstrap method, can be used in applied analysis to obtain more reliable efficiency rankings for farms. The main focus is the smoothed homogeneous bootstrap procedure introduced by Simar and Wilson (1998) to implement statistical inference for the original efficiency point estimates. Two main model specifications, constant and variable returns to scale, are investigated along with various choices regarding data aggregation. The coefficient of separation (CoS), a statistic that indicates the degree of statistical differentiation within the sample, is used to demonstrate the findings. The CoS suggests a substantive dependency of the results on the methodology and assumptions employed. Accordingly, some observations are made on how to conduct DEA in order to get more reliable efficiency rankings, depending on the purpose for which they are to be used. In addition, attention is drawn to the ability of the SLICE MODEL, implemented in GAMS, to enable researchers to overcome the computational burdens of conducting DEA (with bootstrapping).
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 229
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Aigner D., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[2]  
ANKER RD, 1985, MANAGE SCI, V32, P30
[3]   Hypothesis tests using data envelopment analysis [J].
Banker, RD .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1996, 7 (2-3) :139-159
[4]  
Bauer P. W., 1998, J ECON BUS, V50, P85, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0148-6195(97)00072-6
[5]   Estimating confidence intervals for technical efficiency:: the case of private farms in Slovenia [J].
Brümmer, B .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 28 (03) :285-306
[6]  
CHAMES A, 1978, EUR J OPER RES, V46, P185
[7]  
Coelli T.J., 2005, INTRO EFFICIENCY PRO, DOI 10.1007/b136381
[8]   Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches [J].
DeBorger, B ;
Kerstens, K .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1996, 26 (02) :145-170
[9]   THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY [J].
FARRELL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1957, 120 (03) :253-290
[10]   On the use of panel data in stochastic frontier models with improper priors [J].
Fernandez, C ;
Osiewalski, J ;
Steel, MFJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1997, 79 (01) :169-193