COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PIXEL LEVEL FUSION ALGORITHMS IN HIGH RESOLUTION SAR AND OPTICAL IMAGE FUSION

被引:3
作者
Liu, Huiyu [1 ]
Ye, Yuanxin [1 ]
Zhang, Jiacheng [1 ]
Yang, Chao [1 ]
Zhao, Yangang [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Fac Geosci & Environm Engn, Chengdu 611756, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Topog Surveying Brigade 2, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
来源
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2022) | 2022年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SAR; optical image; image fusion;
D O I
10.1109/IGARSS46834.2022.9883331
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Fusion of Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and optical images is a significant topic in the field of remote sensing. As a typical category of image fusion methods, pixel level image fusion algorithms have been widely used in SAR-optical image fusion to integrate their complementary information and facilitate the subsequent interpretation and application. The effectiveness of these methods has been demonstrated in different literatures based on the experiment carried on specific, individual datasets, which make a comprehensive comparison of these algorithms difficult to achieve. This paper builds a sub-meter SAR and optical image dataset covering different types of scenes, the performance of 11 pixel level image methods is then investigated based on qualitative and quantitative analysis. Result shows the gradient pyramid (GP) achieve a high quality fusion when dealing with Optical-SAR image fusion task of residents, the non subsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) performs best when fusing images containing farmland and mountains.
引用
收藏
页码:2829 / 2832
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Battsengel V., 2013, Adv. Remote Sens, V2, P102, DOI DOI 10.4236/ARS.2013.22014
[2]   A review of remote sensing image fusion methods [J].
Ghassemian, Hassan .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2016, 32 :75-89
[3]   Pixel level fusion techniques for SAR and optical images: A review [J].
Kulkarni, Samadhan C. ;
Rege, Priti P. .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 :13-29
[4]   A general framework for image fusion based on multi-scale transform and sparse representation [J].
Liu, Yu ;
Liu, Shuping ;
Wang, Zengfu .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2015, 24 :147-164
[5]   Objective Assessment of Multiresolution Image Fusion Algorithms for Context Enhancement in Night Vision: A Comparative Study [J].
Liu, Zheng ;
Blasch, Erik ;
Xue, Zhiyun ;
Zhao, Jiying ;
Laganiere, Robert ;
Wu, Wei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 34 (01) :94-109
[6]   Infrared and visible image fusion via gradient transfer and total variation minimization [J].
Ma, Jiayi ;
Chen, Chen ;
Li, Chang ;
Huang, Jun .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2016, 31 :100-109
[7]   Evaluation of image fusion methods using PALSAR, RADARSAT-1 and SPOT images for land use/land cover classification [J].
Sanli, Fusun Balik ;
Abdikan, Saygin ;
Esetlili, Mustafa Tolga ;
Sunar, Filiz .
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 45 (04) :591-601
[8]   Multifocus Image Fusion and Restoration With Sparse Representation [J].
Yang, Bin ;
Li, Shutao .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2010, 59 (04) :884-892
[9]   Fast and Robust Matching for Multimodal Remote Sensing Image Registration [J].
Ye, Yuanxin ;
Bruzzone, Lorenzo ;
Shan, Jie ;
Bovolo, Francesca ;
Zhu, Qing .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 57 (11) :9059-9070
[10]   VIFB: A Visible and Infrared Image Fusion Benchmark [J].
Zhang, Xingchen ;
Ye, Ping ;
Xiao, Gang .
2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOPS (CVPRW 2020), 2020, :468-478