The Impact of Waste Paper Recycling on the Carbon Emissions from China's Paper Industry

被引:33
作者
Shang, Di [1 ]
Diao, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
Yu, Lucun [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Agr Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Baoding 071001, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Waste paper recovery rate; Carbon emissions; Material flow analysis; Input-output analysis; Rolling regression; Monte Carlo simulation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; MATERIAL FLOW-ANALYSIS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ANALYSIS MFA; PULP; ENERGY; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; PAPERMAKING;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-020-01417-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As China's demand for paper products increases, China's paper industry faces enormous pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By using material flow analysis in combination with input-output analysis, this study measured the waste paper recovery rate in a more accurate method and analyzed the impact of waste paper recycling on the carbon emissions from China's paper industry. China's waste paper recovery rate estimated in this study was close to 70% in 2017, much higher than that of 48% obtained with the traditional method. The regression results displayed a negative relationship between waste paper recovery rate and CO2 emissions per unit of paper consumption during 2000-2017 in China. The rolling regression results further indicated that the impact of waste paper recycling was becoming stronger on reducing CO2 emissions per unit of paper consumption in China. Since an inverted "U" shape relationship exists between waste paper recovery rate and its reduction effect on carbon emissions from the paper industry, the regression results suggested that China's waste paper recovery rate has not reached the optimal level with regard to carbon emissions from China's paper industry. Thus, although China's waste paper recovery rate has reached a relatively high level, currently waste paper recycling is still an effective method to reduce carbon emissions from China's paper industry.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 821
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   The Nonlinear Relationship between Paper Recycling and Primary Pulp Requirements Modeling Paper Production and Recycling in Europe [J].
Schenk, Niels J. ;
Moll, Henri C. ;
Potting, Jose Prime .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 8 (03) :141-161
[42]   Methodology of supporting decision-making of waste management with material flow analysis (MFA) and consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA): case study of waste paper recycling [J].
Sevigne-Itoiz, Eva ;
Gasol, Caries M. ;
Rieradevall, Joan ;
Gabarrell, Xavier .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 105 :253-262
[43]  
Stawicki B., 2010, The future of paper recycling in Europe: opportunities and limitations
[44]   An investigation of China's import demand for wood pulp and wastepaper [J].
Sun, Changyou .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 61 :113-121
[45]   Uncovering energy use, carbon emissions and environmental burdens of pulp and paper industry: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Sun, Mingxing ;
Wang, Yutao ;
Shi, Lei ;
Klemes, Jiri Jaromir .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 92 :823-833
[46]   A world model of the pulp and paper industry: Demand, energy consumption and emission scenarios to 2030 [J].
Szabo, L. ;
Soria, A. ;
Forsstroem, J. ;
Keraenen, J. T. ;
Hytoenen, E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2009, 12 (03) :257-269
[47]   Empirical evidence on recycling and trade of paper and lead in developed and developing countries [J].
van Beukering, PJH ;
Bouman, MN .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1717-1737
[48]   Quantifying the system-wide recovery potential of waste in the global paper life cycle [J].
van Ewijk, Stijn ;
Park, Joo Young ;
Chertow, Marian R. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 134 :48-60
[49]  
Virtanen Y., 2013, Environmental impacts of waste paper recycling
[50]   Estimating carbon emissions from the pulp and paper industry: A case study [J].
Wang, Yutao ;
Yang, Xuechun ;
Sun, Mingxing ;
Ma, Lei ;
Li, Xiao ;
Shi, Lei .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 :779-789