Peripheral obstructions influence marmot vigilance: integrating observational and experimental results

被引:39
作者
Bednekoff, Peter A. [2 ]
Blumstein, Daniel T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Eastern Michigan Univ, Dept Biol, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
antipredator vigilance; obstruction; predation risk; yellow-bellied marmot; YELLOW-BELLIED MARMOTS; ANTIPREDATOR VIGILANCE; VISUAL OBSTRUCTION; PREDATOR DETECTION; GROUP-SIZE; BIRDS; SQUIRRELS; BEHAVIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/arp104
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Animals generally allocate some time during foraging to detecting predators. We used a combination of observations and an experiment to examine how vegetation height and peripheral obstructions influence vigilance by foraging yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). First, we analyzed a large sample of observations of marmots foraging in nature. Marmots increased vigilance with vegetation height and reared on their hind legs when in tall vegetation. Second, we observed that marmots foraged in locations with lower vegetation than randomly selected sites in the same meadow. These observations suggest that marmots account for what they can see while foraging but do not rule out the influence of other factors correlated with vegetation height. Therefore, we experimentally blocked the view for 3 sides for marmots feeding on a controlled food source. When the apparatus blocked their vigilance, marmots were less vigilant when foraging, often moved outside the apparatus, and showed heightened vigilance while outside the apparatus. Peripheral obstructions explained more of the variance in our experimental than in our observational results. Together, our results demonstrate that marmots employ antipredator behavior to compensate for peripheral obstructions. Long-term studies show that marmots go locally extinct more often in areas with more obstructions to vigilance. Thus, marmots likely face greater predation risk in those areas, despite the behavioral responses documented in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1117
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide
[2]  
Arenz CL, 1997, ETHOLOGY, V103, P945
[3]   Artificial visual obstruction, antipredator vigilance, and predator detection in the thirteen-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus) [J].
Arenz, CL ;
Leger, DW .
BEHAVIOUR, 1997, 134 :1101-1114
[4]  
Armitage K.B., 1986, P303
[5]  
Armitage KB, 2004, AM MIDL NAT, V151, P378, DOI 10.1674/0003-0031(2004)151[0378:BPOYM]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance? [J].
Beauchamp, Guy .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) :1361-1368
[8]   Testing for peripheral vigilance: do birds value what they see when not overtly vigilant? [J].
Bednekoff, PA ;
Lima, SL .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2005, 69 :1165-1171
[9]   Effect of predation risk on the presence and persistence of yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) colonies [J].
Blumstein, D. T. ;
Ozgul, A. ;
Yovovich, V. ;
Van Vuren, D. H. ;
Armitage, K. B. .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2006, 270 (01) :132-138
[10]  
Blumstein D.T., 2007, Quantifying Behavior the JWatcher Way