Angiographic follow-up after carotid artery stenting of bifurcation stenosis

被引:3
作者
Hauth, E. A. [1 ]
Jansen, C.
Drescher, R.
Schwarz, M.
Christmann, A.
Jaeger, H.
Forsting, M.
Mathias, K.
机构
[1] Univ Klin Essen, Inst Diagnost & Interventionelle Radiol & Neurora, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[2] Klinikum Dortmund, Radiol Klin, Dortmund, Germany
[3] Klinikum Dortmund, Neurol Klin, Dortmund, Germany
[4] Klinikum Dortmund, Fachbereich Stat, Dortmund, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2006年 / 178卷 / 08期
关键词
angioplasty; carotid arteries; stents; interventional procedures;
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-926814
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the restenosis grade, the intima hyperplasia and the stent expansion via angiographic follow-up six months after carotid artery stenting. Materials and Methods: In 100 patients, angiographic follow-up was performed 5.9 months (range: 2.9-11.4 months) after carotid artery stenting. The restenosis grade, the intima hyperplasia and the stent expansion were measured by selective angiography of the treated carotid artery. Results: The mean restenosis grade was 16% (range: 0-78%). In 6 of 100 patients (6%), a restenosis grade of > 50% was measured. In 4 patients the restenosis grade was 50-70%. In 2 patients the restenosis grade was > 70%. In 91 of 100 patients (91%), the restenosis was localized in the former area of stenosis of the carotid artery, and in 9 of 100 patients (9%), the restenosis was localized in the cranial stent end. The mean grade of intima hyperplasia was 31% (range: 2-70%). The mean increase in stent expansion at the time of follow-up was 10% (range: 0-59%). No correlation was able to be determined between the grade of stenosis and the grade of restenosis (rho=0,017, range: -0.180-0.213), between the grade of residual stenosis and the grade of restenosis (rho=0,257, range: 0.064-0.431) and between intima hyperplasia and the grade of restenosis (rho=0,476, range: 0.309-0.615). Conclusions: Carotid artery stenting is associated with a low incidence of high-grade restenosis 6 months after an intervention. The intima hyperplasia, which can be observed in each Wallstent, is partly compensated by the expansion of the self-expandable stent. Without a correlation between the grade of residual stenosis and the grade of restenosis, low-grade residual stenosis can be accepted. Therefore, we recommend undersized postdilation of the Wallstent.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 800
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] 2
  • [12] Clinical results of carotid artery stenting with a nitinol self-expanding stent (SMART stent)
    Drescher, R
    Mathias, KD
    Jaeger, HJ
    Bockisch, G
    Demirel, E
    Gissler, HM
    Hauth, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (10) : 2451 - 2456
  • [13] Morphological predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in humans
    Farb, A
    Weber, DK
    Kolodgie, FD
    Burke, AP
    Virmani, R
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (25) : 2974 - 2980
  • [14] HOW TO MEASURE CAROTID STENOSIS
    FOX, AJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) : 316 - 318
  • [15] ESTIMATING WITH CONFIDENCE
    GARDNER, MJ
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 296 (6631) : 1210 - 1211
  • [16] Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting
    Gröschel, K
    Riecker, A
    Schulz, JB
    Ernemann, U
    Kastrup, A
    [J]. STROKE, 2005, 36 (02) : 367 - 373
  • [17] Henry M, 1998, J ENDOVASC SURG, V5, P293, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1998)005<0293:AASOTE>2.0.CO
  • [18] 2
  • [19] Clinical experience of cerebral protection with balloon occlusion during carotid artery stenting.
    Jäger, HJ
    Mathias, KD
    Drescher, R
    Bockisch, G
    Hauth, E
    Demirel, E
    Gissler, HM
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2001, 173 (02): : 139 - 146
  • [20] Incidence of intimal proliferation and apoptosis following balloon angioplasty in an atherosclerotic rabbit model
    Kamenz, J
    Seibold, W
    Wohlfrom, M
    Hanke, S
    Heise, N
    Lenz, C
    Hanke, H
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2000, 45 (03) : 766 - 776