The Impact of Patient and Surgical Factors on the Rate of Postoperative Infection After Total Hip Arthroplasty-A New Zealand Joint Registry Study

被引:36
作者
Smith, James O. [1 ]
Frampton, Christopher M. A. [2 ]
Hooper, Gary J. [2 ]
Young, Simon W. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Shore Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; THA; infection; laminar flow; joint registry; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; OF-THE-LITERATURE; RISK-FACTORS; SITE INFECTION; MEDICARE PATIENTS; ULTRACLEAN AIR; OPERATING-ROOM; REPLACEMENT; REVISION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.021
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The potential to define and modify risk factors for infection represents an important opportunity to reduce the incidence of PJI. This study uses New Zealand Joint Registry data to identify independent risk factors associated with PJI after primary THA. Methods: Data on 91,585 THAs performed between 2000 and 2014 were analyzed. Factors associated with revision for PJI within 12 months were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Revision rates for PJI were 0.15% and 0.21% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations with the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (odds ratio [OR] 6.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-29.39), severe or morbid obesity (OR 2.15, CI 1.01-4.60 and OR 3.73, CI 1.49-9.39), laminar flow ventilation (OR 1.98, CI 1.38-2.85), consultant-supervised trainee operations (OR 1.94, CI 1.22-3.08), male gender (OR 1.68, CI 1.23-2.30) and anterolateral approach (OR 1.62, CI 1.11-2.37). Procedures performed in the private sector were protective for revision for infection (OR 0.68, CI 0.48-0.96). Conclusions: The PJI risk profile for patients undergoing THA is constituted of a complex of patient and surgical factors. Several patient factors had strong independent associations with revision rates for PJI. Although surgical factors were less important, these may be more readily modifiable in practice. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1884 / 1890
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Control Study
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Ward, Derek T.
    Lau, Edmund C.
    Chan, Vanessa
    Wetters, Nathan G.
    Naziri, Qais
    Odum, Susan
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Gioe, Terence J.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (01) : 154 - 156
  • [42] Infection and Mechanical Complications Are Risk Factors for New Diagnosis of a Mental Health Disorder After Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Figoni, Andrew Michael
    Lalchandani, Gopal R.
    Markes, Alexander R.
    Sing, David
    Hansen, Erik Nathan
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 10 : 1 - 5
  • [43] Trends in surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection after primary total hip arthroplasty in two national health registers 2013-2022
    Karlsen, O. E.
    Dale, H.
    Furnes, O.
    Eriksen-Volle, H-M.
    Westberg, M.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2025, 159 : 148 - 155
  • [44] Comparing modern uncemented, hybrid and cemented implant combinations in older patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, a New Zealand Joint Registry study
    Boyle, Alexander Buckenham
    Zhu, Mark
    Frampton, Chris
    Poutawera, Vaughan
    Vane, Andrew
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (06) : 3597 - 3604
  • [45] Preoperative psychosocial factors predicting patient's functional recovery after total knee or total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Bletterman, Anouck N.
    de Geest-Vrolijk, Marcella E.
    Vriezekolk, Johanna E.
    Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W.
    van Meeteren, Nico L. U.
    Hoogeboom, Thomas J.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (04) : 512 - 525
  • [46] New Surgical Treatment Using a Docking Nail for Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Nakano, Shunji
    Yoshioka, Shinji
    Tezuka, Fumitake
    Nakamura, Masaru
    Chikawa, Takashi
    Shimakawa, Tateaki
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (02) : 326 - 330
  • [47] Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty
    Blanco, Juan F.
    Diaz, Agustin
    Melchor, Francisco R.
    da Casa, Carmen
    Pescador, David
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [48] Postoperative Deep Infection After Cemented Versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis
    Yoon, Byung-Ho
    Ha, Yong-Chan
    Lee, Young-Kyun
    Koo, Kyung-Hoi
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (10) : 1823 - 1827
  • [49] Arthroplasty-center related retrospective analysis of risk factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after primary and after revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Radtke, Kerstin
    Tetzlaff, T.
    Vaske, B.
    Ettinger, M.
    Claassen, L.
    Floerkemeier, T.
    Windhagen, H.
    von Lewinski, G.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 (05) : 721 - 728
  • [50] Does gender influence how patients rate their patient experience after total hip arthroplasty?
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    Gwam, Chukwuweike U.
    Mistry, Jaydev B.
    Chughtai, Morad
    Khlopas, Anton
    Yakubek, George
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    Mont, Michael A.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (01) : 40 - 43