Efficacy of a Digital Health Tool on Contraceptive Ideation and Use in Nigeria: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Control Trial

被引:16
|
作者
Babalola, Stella [1 ]
Loehr, Caitlin [2 ]
Oyenubi, Olamide [1 ]
Akiode, Akinsewa [3 ]
Mobley, Allison
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Ctr Commun Programs, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[2] IntraHlth Int, Washington, DC USA
[3] Nigeria Urban Reprod Hlth Initiat, Abuja, Nigeria
来源
GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE | 2019年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
SMART PATIENT; REPRODUCTIVE-AGE; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNICATION; WOMEN; CONSULTATIONS; EMPOWERMENT; DELIVERY; QUALITY; SERVICE;
D O I
10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00066
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Contraceptive prevalence in Nigeria remains among the lowest in the world, which substantially contributes to the countr/s high maternal and child mortality. Mobile phone technology penetration has increased considerably in Nigeria, opening opportunities for programs to use this medium for reaching their intended audience with health-protective information. Methods: In 2017, the Health Communication Capacity Collaborative conducted a cluster-randomized control trial in Kaduna City to assess the efficacy of the digital health tool Smart Client on ideational and behavioral variables related to family planning. Twelve wards in the city were randomly assigned to intervention (6 wards) and control (6 wards) arms of the study. A total of 565 women aged 18-35 years were randomly selected from study wards and consented to participate in the study. At recruitment, the women completed a baseline survey. The women in the intervention group were registered to receive 1 welcome call, 13 program calls, and 3 quiz calls on their mobile phones. Each of the program calls had several segments, including introduction, drama episode, and friend-to-friend chat. The last quiz call included evaluation questions. Women in the control arm received no intervention. The efficacy of the intervention was assessed using both perprotocol and intent-to-treat differences-in-differences techniques. Results: The intervention and control arms were equivalent in terms of key sociodemographic characteristics, with the exception of religion. Attrition was a major challenge in the study. On average, participants receiving the intervention listened to 7.2 drama episodes but only 2.6 personal stories and 1.1 sample dialogues. The results of both per-protocol and intent-to-treat analyses show that the intervention was efficacious in improving relevant ideational and behavioral outcomes. For example, the intent-to-treat results show that the intervention increased women's perceived level of confidence to discuss family planning with a provider by 27.7 percentage points and modern contraceptive prevalence by 14.8 percentage points. Conclusion: This efficacy assessment showed that using an interactive voice response-based digital tool that includes drama is a viable option for promoting positive ideation about family planning and increasing contraceptive use in Nigeria. Significant lessons learned from this efficacy trial include informing participants at the time of recruitment of what the opening segment of the calls will sound like to avoid the calls being mistaken for telemarketing calls and intensive testing prior to scale-up to avoid potential attrition due to technical issues.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 288
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Apathy in nursing home residents with dementia: Results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Treusch, Y.
    Majic, T.
    Page, J.
    Gutzmann, H.
    Heinz, A.
    Rapp, M. A.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 30 (02) : 251 - 257
  • [42] Strategies to promote smoking cessation in general practice: Results of a cluster-randomized trial.
    Twardella, D
    Brenner, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 161 (11) : S105 - S105
  • [43] Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent for Control of Malaria in Indonesia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial (vol 103, pg 344, 2020)
    Syafruddin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2020, 103 (05): : 2151 - 2151
  • [45] The use of a communication tool about diet at the child health centre: A cluster randomized controlled trial
    Fagerlund, Bettina Holmberg
    Helseth, Solvi
    Andersen, Lene F.
    Smastuen, Milada C.
    Glavin, Kari
    NURSING OPEN, 2020, 7 (04): : 1217 - 1232
  • [46] Prevention of Illicit Drug Use Through a School-Based Program: Results of a Longitudinal, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
    Guo, Jong-Long
    Lee, Tzu-Chi
    Liao, Jung-Yu
    Huang, Chiu-Mieh
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2015, 56 (03) : 314 - 322
  • [47] Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive - A randomized controlled trial
    Audet, MC
    Moreau, M
    Koltun, WD
    Waldbaum, AS
    Shangold, G
    Fisher, AC
    Creasy, GW
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (18): : 2347 - 2354
  • [48] The effect of a postpartum intrauterine device programme on choice of contraceptive method in Tanzania: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial
    Senderowicz, Leigh
    Sokol, Natasha
    Pearson, Erin
    Francis, Joel
    Ulenga, Nzovu
    Baernighausen, Till
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2023, 38 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [49] Effects of an online personal health record on medication accuracy and safety: a cluster-randomized trial
    Schnipper, Jeffrey L.
    Gandhi, Tejal K.
    Wald, Jonathan S.
    Grant, Richard W.
    Poon, Eric G.
    Volk, Lynn A.
    Businger, Alexandra
    Williams, Deborah H.
    Siteman, Elizabeth
    Buckel, Lauren
    Middleton, Blackford
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 19 (05) : 728 - 734
  • [50] Community Health Workers for Prevention of Corneal Ulcers in South India: A Cluster-Randomized Trial
    Srinivasan, Muthiah
    Ravilla, Thulasiraj
    Vijayakumar, Valaguru
    Yesunesan, Devanesam
    Mani, Iswarya
    Whitcher, John P.
    Oldenburg, Catherine E.
    O'brien, Kieran S.
    Lietman, Thomas M.
    Keenan, Jeremy D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 237 : 259 - 266