A gesture-based design tool: Assessing 2DOF vs. 4DOF steerable instrument control

被引:2
作者
Arkenbout, E. A. [1 ]
de Winter, J. C. F. [1 ]
Ali, A. [1 ]
Dankelman, J. [1 ]
Breedveld, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Mech Maritime & Mat Engn, Dept Biomech Engn, Delft, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
HAPTIC FEEDBACK; PERFORMANCE; SURGERY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0199367
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Iterative prototyping is costly and time-consuming. Particularly when designing medical instruments, human factors related design choices significantly impact performance and safety. A tool is presented that allows for the evaluation of steerable instrument controls before the onset of the prototyping stage. The design tool couples gestural input to virtually simulated instrument motions using hand motion tracking. We performed a human-subject evaluation of two manual control strategies that differed in their degrees of freedom (DOF). 2DOF thumb control was compared to 4DOF thumb-index finger control. Results identified regions within the instrument workspace that are difficult to reach and showed participants to favor using the thumb for gross and fine-tuning motions at both control strategies. Index finger ab/adduction was found to be least functional. A strong learning effect was observed at 4DOF control. Based on the results, gesture-based instrument design is a viable design tool.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]   Compact teleoperated laparoendoscopic single-site robotic surgical system: Kinematics, control, and operation [J].
Isaac-Lowry, Oran Jacob ;
Okamoto, Steele ;
Pedram, Sahba Aghajani ;
Woo, Russell ;
Berkelman, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (04)
[32]   Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity [J].
Kalloo, AN ;
Singh, VK ;
Jagannath, SB ;
Niiyama, H ;
Hill, SL ;
Vaughn, CA ;
Magee, CA ;
Kantsevoy, SV .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (01) :114-117
[33]   Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Keehner, MM ;
Tendick, F ;
Meng, MV ;
Anwar, HP ;
Hegarty, M ;
Stoller, ML ;
Duh, QY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (01) :71-75
[34]   Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns [J].
Kensing F. ;
Blomberg J. .
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1998, 7 (3-4) :167-185
[35]   Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art [J].
Khaleghi, Bahador ;
Khamis, Alaa ;
Karray, Fakhreddine O. ;
Razavi, Saiedeh N. .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2013, 14 (01) :28-44
[36]  
Koller S, 2015, 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS (ROBIO), P1421, DOI 10.1109/ROBIO.2015.7418970
[37]  
Krieger Y. S., 2016, 15 CURAC ANN C, P111
[38]   Flexible robotic endoscopy: current and original devices [J].
Kume, Keiichiro .
COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 21 (01) :150-159
[39]   Design and evaluation of a variable stiffness manual operating platform for laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) [J].
Li, Jinhua ;
Li, Xuejie ;
Wang, Jianchen ;
Xing, Yuan ;
Wang, Shuxin ;
Ren, Xiangyun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (04)
[40]   Kinematic comparison of surgical tendon-driven manipulators and concentric tube manipulators [J].
Li, Zheng ;
Wu, Liao ;
Ren, Hongliang ;
Yu, Haoyong .
MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2017, 107 :148-165