The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove

被引:95
作者
Shih, YF
Bull, AMJ
Amis, AA
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Mech Engn, Biomech Sect, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Bioengn, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
femur; patellofemoral joint; geometry; anatomy; femoral groove;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-003-0414-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Photography was used to study the geometry of the cartilaginous and osseous contours of the distal femur and the orientation of the trochlear groove in 9 fresh-frozen and 24 embalmed knees. The sulcus angle (146.1degrees+/-5.5degrees) decreased from 0degrees to 50degrees of femoral flexion then increased afterwards. The maximum slope of the lateral femoral condyle (20.2degrees +/- 5.2degrees) also decreased with flexion. Both the sulcus angle (p=0.0007) and maximum slope (p=0.0001) were larger at 0degrees than they were for 60degrees cartilaginous surfaces. The lateral femoral condylar height decreased, whilst the medial femoral condylar height increased as the flexion increased. The femoral groove was midway between the two femoral epicondyles (49.5 +/- 3.9%), but deviated laterally as the flexion angle increased. The groove axis deviated distally and laterally from the femoral anatomical axis for both cartilaginous and bony surfaces, and the angle between the groove and anatomical axes was similar for both cartilaginous (19.1degrees) and osseous (16.8degrees) surfaces. Articular cartilage is not well represented on radiography yet it had a significant effect on the distal. femoral geometry, and should be taken into account when evaluating the patellofemoral joint..
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 306
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   In vitro measurement of the tracking pattern of the human patella [J].
Ahmed, AM ;
Duncan, NA ;
Tanzer, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (02) :222-228
[2]  
BERGER RA, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V286, P40
[3]  
BRATTSTROEM H., 1964, Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, V68, P1, DOI DOI 10.3109/ORT.1964.35.SUPPL-68.01
[4]   PATELLAR TRACKING PATTERNS DURING ACTIVE AND PASSIVE KNEE EXTENSION - EVALUATION WITH MOTION-TRIGGERED CINE MR IMAGING [J].
BROSSMANN, J ;
MUHLE, C ;
SCHRODER, C ;
MELCHERT, UH ;
BULL, CC ;
SPIELMANN, RP ;
HELLER, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (01) :205-212
[5]   Standardisation of the description of patellofemoral motion and comparison between different techniques [J].
Bull, AMJ ;
Katchburian, MV ;
Shih, YF ;
Amis, AA .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2002, 10 (03) :184-193
[6]  
CARSON WG, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P178
[7]  
Dejour H, 1994, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, V2, P19, DOI 10.1007/BF01552649
[8]   Location of the femoral sulcus in the osteoarthritic knee [J].
Eckhoff, DG ;
Montgomery, WK ;
Stamm, ER ;
Kilcoyne, RF .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (02) :163-165
[9]  
ECKHOFF DG, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V331, P23
[10]  
FEINSTEIN WK, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V331, P64