Spatio-temporal interpolation of soil water, temperature, and electrical conductivity in 3D+T: The Cook Agronomy Farm data set

被引:72
作者
Gasch, Caley K. [1 ]
Hengl, Tomislav [2 ]
Graeler, Benedikt [3 ]
Meyer, Hanna [4 ]
Magney, Troy S. [5 ]
Brown, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, ISRIC World Soil Informat, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Munster, Inst Geoinformat, Munster, Germany
[4] Univ Marburg, Dept Geog Environm Informat, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
[5] Univ Idaho, Coll Nat Resources, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
关键词
Digital soil mapping; Random forests algorithm; Regression-kriging; Soil sensor network; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS; MOISTURE; PREDICTION; NITROGEN; CATCHMENT; STORAGE; STRESS; RED;
D O I
10.1016/j.spasta.2015.04.001
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The paper describes a framework for modeling dynamic soil properties in 3-dimensions and time (3D + T) using soil data collected with automated sensor networks as a case study. Two approaches to geostatistical modeling and spatio-temporal predictions are described: (1) 3D + T predictive modeling using random forests algorithms, and (2) 3D + T kriging model after detrending the observations for depth-dependent seasonal effects. All the analyses used data from the Cook Agronomy Farm (37 ha), which includes hourly measurements of soil volumetric water content, temperature, and bulk electrical conductivity at 42 stations and five depths (0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 m), collected over five years. This data set also includes 2-and 3-dimensional, temporal, and spatio-temporal covariates covering the same area. The results of (strict) leave-onestation- out cross-validation indicate that both models accurately predicted soil temperature, while predictive power was lower for water content, and lowest for electrical conductivity. The kriging model explained 37%, 96%, and 18% of the variability in water content, temperature, and electrical conductivity respectively versus 34%, 93%, and 5% explained by the random forests model. A less rigorous simple cross-validation of the random forests model indicated improved predictive power when at least some data were available for each station, explaining 86%, 97%, and 88% of the variability in water content, temperature, and electrical conductivity respectively. The high difference between the strict and simple cross-validation indicates high temporal auto-correlation of values at measurement stations. Temporal model components (i.e. day of the year and seasonal trends) explained most of the variability in observations in both models for all three variables. The seamless predictions of 3D + T data produced from this analysis can assist in understanding soil processes and how they change through a season, under different land management scenarios, and how they relate to other environmental processes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 90
页数:21
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Estimating soil moisture using remote sensing data: A machine learning approach
    Ahmad, Sajjad
    Kalra, Ajay
    Stephen, Haroon
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2010, 33 (01) : 69 - 80
  • [2] Al-Mulla YA, 2009, APPL ENG AGRIC, V25, P45
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, LATTICE LATTICE GRAP
  • [4] Spatial distribution of soil moisture in a small catchment. Part 1: Geostatistical analysis
    Bardossy, A
    Lehmann, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1998, 206 (1-2) : 1 - 15
  • [5] Barnes E., 2000, P INT C PREC AGR BLO
  • [6] Beaudette D., 2013, AQP ALGORITHMS QUANT
  • [7] Beven KJ., 1979, HYDROL SCI B, V24, P43, DOI [10.1080/02626667909491834, DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834]
  • [8] Bivand R., 2014, RGDAL BINDINGS GEOSP
  • [9] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [10] Brenning A., 2013, RSAGA SAGA GEOPROCES