A Three-Way Decision Approach for Water Resources System Resilience Evaluation and Its Application

被引:5
作者
Yang, Yafeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Hongrui [1 ]
Zhao, Yong [3 ]
Gong, Shuxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Sci, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
[3] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
water resources system; resilience; resistibility-recoverability-adaptability; variable fuzzy sets method; grade eigenvalue; set pair analysis; partial connection number; three-way decision; Yangtze River Economic Belt;
D O I
10.1134/S0097807822060185
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Resilience is a significant uncertainty thought of water resources system security. Compared with risk analysis, resilience pays more attention to the ability of water resources system itself to deal with adverse events. However, a standard system of water resources system resilience's concept and evaluation have not yet formed. In view of this, this study had attempted to decompose the process of resisting interference of water resources system and analyzed the characteristics and influencing factors of three sub processes of resistance, recovery and adaptation. Furtherly, a new resilience evaluation index system of water resources system was explored and a three-way dicision approach for water resources system resilience analysis based on variable fuzzy sets and partial connection number was developed. Specifically, a multi-grade quantitative evaluation of water resources resilience was carried out based on variable fuzzy sets method, and then the quantitative evaluation results were transformed into qualitative decision-making results using a new three-way decision model based on partial connection number of set pair analysis. Finally, a case study of China's Yangtze River Economic Belt (YEB) in 2008-2017 was performed and the results show that the resilience of water resources system in the YEB does not show an obvious improvement trend, or even almost stagnant. Of the 110 samples, 83.6% were at the medium level. Only 6.4% are barely at the excellent level, but they are basically in Shanghai.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1104
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The arctic water resource vulnerability index: An integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater [J].
Alessa, Lilian ;
Kliskey, Andrew ;
Lammers, Richard ;
Arp, Chris ;
White, Dan ;
Hinzman, Larry ;
Busey, Robert .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (03) :523-541
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 4 UNESCO UN WORLD WA
[3]   Evaluating the resilience of water resources management scenarios using the evidential reasoning approach: The Zarrinehrud river basin experience [J].
Behboudian, Massoud ;
Kerachian, Reza .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 284 (284)
[4]   Dynamic Regulation of Reservoir Drought Limit Water Level [J].
Cao, Runxiang ;
Li, Fawen ;
Zhao, Yong .
WATER RESOURCES, 2021, 48 (02) :194-203
[5]  
Chen Shou-yu, 2005, Journal of Dalian University of Technology, V45, P308
[6]  
[陈守煜 Chen Shouyu], 2012, [水利学报, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering], V43, P1066
[7]   Water security, risk, and economic growth: Insights from a dynamical systems model [J].
Dadson, Simon ;
Hall, Jim W. ;
Garrick, Dustin ;
Sadoff, Claudia ;
Grey, David ;
Whittington, Dale .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (08) :6425-6438
[8]   Building Water Resilience in the Face of Global Change: From a Blue-Only to a Green-Blue Water Approach to Land-Water Management [J].
Falkenmark, M. ;
Rockstrom, J. .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (06) :606-610
[9]  
Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
[10]   System resilience assessment method of urban lifeline system for GIS [J].
Huang, Wenjie ;
Ling, Mengzhi .
COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2018, 71 :67-80