How Do Stakeholders Perceive Barriers to Large-Scale Wind Power Diffusion? A Q-Method Case Study from Ceara State, Brazil

被引:4
作者
Frate, Claudio Albuquerque [1 ,2 ]
Brannstrom, Christian [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Ctr Sustainable Dev, BR-72405610 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Geog, BR-60455900 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
wind power; barriers; Q-method; Brazil; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; SOLAR; NORTHEAST; IMPLEMENTATION; PERSPECTIVES; ACCEPTANCE; GENERATION; DEPLOYMENT; POLICIES; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.3390/en12112063
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
High penetration of renewable power requires technical, organizational, and political changes. We use Q-method, a qualitative-quantitative technique, to identify and analyze views held by key actors on challenges for large-scale diffusion of wind power in Ceara State, Brazil, an early leader in wind power with 2.05 GW installed capacity. Four quantitatively determined social perspectives were identified with regard to views on challenges for wind power expansion: (1) failing because of the grid; (2) environmental challenges; (3) planning for wind, and (4) participating in wind. Each social perspective emphasizes a different array of barriers, such as cost of new transmission lines, transformation of a hydro-thermal mental model, predictive capacity for wind energy, and the need for participatory forum. Understanding the subjective views of stakeholders is a key first step in eventually reducing these barriers to renewable power penetration through diverse policy interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Amarante O.A., 2001, Atlas do Potencial Eolico Brasileiro
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
  • [3] [Anonymous], PQMETHOD SOFTWARE VE
  • [4] AssociacAo Brasileira de Energia Eolica (ABEELICA), 2019, NUM AB FEV 2019
  • [5] Brannstrom C., 2018, Revista Brasileira de Geografia, V63, P3, DOI DOI 10.21579/ISSN.2526-03752018N1P3-28
  • [6] Is Brazilian wind power development sustainable? Insights from a review of conflicts in Ceara state
    Brannstrom, Christian
    Gorayeb, Adryane
    Mendes, Jociclea de Sousa
    Loureiro, Caroline
    de Andrade Meireles, Antonio Jeovah
    da Silva, Edson Vicente
    Ribeiro de Freitas, Ana Larissa
    de Oliveira, Rafael Fialho
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 62 - 71
  • [7] Should BIPV technologies be empowered by innovation policy mix to facilitate energy transitions? - Revealing stakeholders' different perspectives using Q methodology
    Chang, Ruidong
    Cao, Yuan
    Lu, Yujie
    Shabunko, Veronika
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 307 - 318
  • [8] Electricity supply security and the future role of renewable energy sources in Brazil
    da Silva, Rodrigo Correa
    Neto, Ismael de Marchi
    Seifert, Stephan Silva
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 59 : 328 - 341
  • [9] The patterns of induced diffusion: Evidence from the international diffusion of wind energy
    Davies, Stephen W.
    Diaz-Rainey, Ivan
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2011, 78 (07) : 1227 - 1241
  • [10] The future of power generation in Brazil: An analysis of alternatives to Amazonian hydropower development
    de Faria, Felipe A. M.
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 41 : 24 - 35