Physical, Hydraulic, and Mechanical Properties of Clayey Soil Stabilized by Lightweight Alkali-Activated Slag Geopolymer

被引:77
作者
Du, Yan-Jun [1 ]
Yu, Bo-Wei [1 ]
Liu, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Ning-Jun [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Martin D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Inst Geotech Engn, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Poly Real Estate Grp Co Ltd, Foshan 528200, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[4] Univ Wollongong, Fac Engn, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Geomaterials; Lightweight; Geopolymer; Water absorption; Hydraulic conductivity; Strength; CALCIUM CARBIDE RESIDUE; FLY-ASH; ENGINEERING PROPERTIES; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; COMPRESSIBILITY; MICROSTRUCTURE; AGGREGATE; HYDRATION; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001743
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Lightweight cement materials are extensively used in the infrastructure construction. Geopolymer is a low-carbon and environmentally friendly cementitious material. This paper presents an investigation on the physical, hydraulic, and mechanical characteristics of lightweight geopolymer stabilized soil (LGSS) and a comparison with lightweight cement stabilized soil (LCSS). Measurements of volumetric absorption (VA) of water, hydraulic conductivity (k), and unconfined compressive strength (qu), scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) test, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) are conducted. The results show that LGSS has higher VA than LCSS. The k of LGSS is one order of magnitude higher than that of LCSS. The qu of LGSS is 2-3.5 times of that of LCSS. Microstructurally, the VA and k of LGSS are found to be positively correlated with the volume of large air pores (>10m). Higher qu of LGSS than LCSS is attributed to more hydration products that fill up the voids of soil. It is concluded that LGSS gives better engineering performances than LCSS in terms of water absorption, permeability, and strength characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, D497213 ASTM, DOI DOI 10.1520/D4972-13.2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ASTM D2487-17, DOI DOI 10.1520/D4253-00R06
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, D. ASTM, 4219-08
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STANDARD TEST METHOD, DOI [10.1520/D4318-17E01, DOI 10.1520/D4318-17E01]
[5]   Lightweight concretes of activated metakaolin-fly ash binders, with blast furnace slag aggregates [J].
Arellano Aguilar, R. ;
Burciaga Diaz, O. ;
Escalante Garcia, J. I. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2010, 24 (07) :1166-1175
[6]   Spent Coffee Grounds-Fly Ash Geopolymer Used as an Embankment Structural Fill Material [J].
Arulrajah, Arul ;
Kua, Teck-Ang ;
Phetchuay, Chayakrit ;
Horpibulsuk, Suksun ;
Mahghoolpilehrood, Farshid ;
Disfani, Mahdi Miri .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 (05)
[7]  
ASTM, 2010, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND
[8]  
ASTM, 2012, C796C796M ASTM
[9]   Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack [J].
Bakharev, T .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2005, 35 (04) :658-670
[10]  
Barnes P., 2002, STRUCTURE PERFORMANC, VSecond