Where does all the biofuel go? Fuel efficiency gains and its effects on global agricultural production

被引:20
作者
Dumortier, Jerome [1 ]
Carriquiry, Miguel [2 ]
Elobeid, Amani [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Univ Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay
[3] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA USA
关键词
Biofuel; Land-use change; Global agriculture; Fuel efficiency; Greenhouse gas emissions; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LAND-USE; UNITED-STATES; ETHANOL; US; MARKET; POLICIES; IMPACTS; PRICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111909
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Increasing biofuel production over the last decade and biofuel policies in Brazil, the European Union, and the United States have changed the global agricultural landscape in terms of land-use, commodity prices, and trade. Increasing fuel efficiency and electrification of the vehicle stock is projected to lower gasoline, diesel, and biofuel demand in the future. In this analysis, we quantify the effects of a 30% reduction in ethanol consumption in the U.S. and the European Union triggered by higher vehicle fleet fuel efficiency on global agricultural markets. Our results show decreases in global commodity prices by 1.9%-6.6% and a slight decrease in global cropland by 0.3%. Major changes occur in trade patterns with U.S. corn exports increasing by 30.3%. Global greenhouse gas emissions are lower due to the overall reduction in cropland. Gasoline and diesel consumption of the vehicle fleet is not changing rapidly but is a long-term process because vehicles are on average in operation for 10 or more years. Consequently, there are important long-term policy implications from changes in fuel efficiency requirements or ethanol blending limits that affect commodity prices, trade, and greenhouse gas emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
ANFAVEA, 2015, TECHNICAL REPORT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The future of food and agriculture: Alternative pathways to 2050
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OECD - Principles on Water Governance, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1787/9789264119284-EN]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Technical Report
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, World energy outlook 2018
[6]  
Beckman J., 2015, EC INFORM B, V144
[7]   Who did the ethanol tax credit benefit? An event analysis of subsidy incidence [J].
Bielen, David A. ;
Newell, Richard G. ;
Pizer, William A. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2018, 161 :1-14
[8]   The Impact of Ethanol Plants on Surrounding Farmland Values: A Case Study [J].
Blomendahl, Ben H. ;
Perrin, Richard K. ;
Johnson, Bruce B. .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2011, 87 (02) :223-232
[9]   Incorporating Sub-National Brazilian Agricultural Production and Land-Use into US Biofuel Policy Evaluation [J].
Carriquiry, Miguel ;
Elobeid, Amani ;
Dumortier, Jerome ;
Goodrich, Ryan .
APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2020, 42 (03) :497-523
[10]   Impacts of ethanol policy on corn prices: A review and meta-analysis of recent evidence [J].
Condon, Nicole ;
Klemick, Heather ;
Wolverton, Ann .
FOOD POLICY, 2015, 51 :63-73