Scaling of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm on superconducting qubit based hardware

被引:0
作者
Weidenfeller, Johannes [1 ]
Valor, Lucia C. [1 ]
Gacon, Julien [1 ]
Tornow, Caroline [1 ]
Bello, Luciano [1 ]
Woerner, Stefan [1 ]
Egger, Daniel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] IBM Quantum, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION; CIRCUITS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum computers may provide good solutions to combinatorial optimization problems by leveraging the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). The QAOA is often presented as an algorithm for noisy hard-ware. However, hardware constraints limit its applicability to problem instances that closely match the connectivity of the qubits. Furthermore, the QAOA must outpace classical solvers. Here, we investigate swap strate-gies to map dense problems into linear, grid and heavy-hex coupling maps. A line-based swap strategy works best for linear and two-dimensional grid coupling maps. Heavy-hex coupling maps require an adaptation of the line swap strategy. By contrast, three-dimensional grid coupling maps benefit from a different swap strategy. Using known entropic arguments we find that the required gate fidelity for dense problems lies deep below the fault-tolerant threshold. We also provide a method-ology to reason about the execution-time of QAOA. Finally, we present a QAOA Qiskit Runtime program and execute the closed-loop optimization on cloud-based quantum com-puters with transpiler settings optimized for QAOA. This work highlights some obstacles to improve to make QAOA competitive, such as gate fidelity, gate speed, and the large number of shots needed. The Qiskit Runtime program gives us a tool to investigate such issues at scale on noisy superconducting qubit hardware.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 107 条
[91]   Simulating the dynamics of braiding of Majorana zero modes using an IBM quantum computer [J].
Stenger, John P. T. ;
Bronn, Nicholas T. ;
Egger, Daniel J. ;
Pekker, David .
PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2021, 3 (03)
[92]   Training the quantum approximate optimization algorithm without access to a quantum processing unit [J].
Streif, Michael ;
Leib, Martin .
QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 5 (03)
[93]   Stochastic gradient descent for hybrid quantum-classical optimization [J].
Sweke, Ryan ;
Wilde, Frederik ;
Meyer, Johannes Jakob ;
Schuld, Maria ;
Faehrmann, Paul K. ;
Meynard-Piganeau, Barthelemy ;
Eisert, Jens .
QUANTUM, 2020, 4
[94]  
Tate R., 2020, BRIDGING CLASSICAL Q
[95]  
Tate R, 2023, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2112.11354
[96]   Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits [J].
Temme, Kristan ;
Bravyi, Sergey ;
Gambetta, Jay M. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2017, 119 (18)
[97]  
Treinish Matthew, 2023, Zenodo
[98]  
van den Berg E, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2201.09866
[99]  
Wack A, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2110.14108
[100]   Accelerated Variational Quantum Eigensolver [J].
Wang, Daochen ;
Higgott, Oscar ;
Brierley, Stephen .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2019, 122 (14)