Determination of uncertainties in energy and exergy analysis of a power plant

被引:16
作者
Ege, Ahmet [1 ]
Sahin, Haci Mehmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Elect Generat Co, Dept Nucl Power Plants, TR-06520 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Technol, TR-06503 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Thermal power plant; Exergy; Uncertainty; Sensitivity; Efficiency; Energy;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.088
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, energy and exergy efficiency uncertainties of a large scale lignite fired power plant cycle and various measurement parameter sensitivities were investigated for five different design power outputs (100%, 85%, 80%, 60% and 40%) and with real data of the plant. For that purpose a black box method was employed considering coal flow with Lower Heating Value (LHV) as a single input and electricity produced as a single output of the plant. The uncertainty of energy and exergy efficiency of the plant was evaluated with this method by applying sensitivity analysis depending on the effect of measurement parameters such as LHV, coal mass flow rate, cell generator output voltage/current. In addition, an extreme case analysis was investigated to determine the maximum range of the uncertainties. Results of the black box method showed that uncertainties varied between 1.82-1.98% for energy efficiency and 1.32-1.43% for exergy efficiency of the plant at an operating power level of 40-100% of full power. It was concluded that LHV determination was the most important uncertainty source of energy and exergy efficiency of the plant. The uncertainties of the extreme case analysis were determined between 2.30% and 2.36% for energy efficiency while 1.66% and 1.70% for exergy efficiency for 40-100% power output respectively. Proposed method was shown to be an approach for understanding major uncertainties as well as effects of some measurement parameters in a large scale thermal power plant. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 406
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study [J].
Ameri, Mohammad ;
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Hamidi, Armita .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (05) :499-512
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, AVAILABILITY ANAL GU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, 621180036238916 DIN
[4]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[5]   Fourier transform method for sensitivity analysis in coal fired power plant [J].
Bresolin, Cirilo S. ;
Diniz da Costa, Joao C. ;
Rudolph, Victor ;
Schneider, Paulo Smith .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 48 (10) :2699-2707
[6]   Comparative energetic and exergetic performance analyses for coal-fired thermal power plants in Turkey [J].
Erdem, Hasan Huseyin ;
Akkaya, Ali Volkan ;
Cetin, Burhanettin ;
Dagdas, Ahmet ;
Sevilgen, Suleyman Hakan ;
Sahin, Bahri ;
Teke, Ismail ;
Gungor, Cengiz ;
Atas, Selcuk .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2009, 48 (11) :2179-2186
[7]   Uncertainties in heat-pump coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency based on standardized testing [J].
Ertesvag, Ivar S. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (08) :1937-1946
[8]  
Holman JP, 2012, EXPT METHODS ENG, P65
[9]   Measurement uncertainty according to ISO/BIPM-GUM [J].
Kessel, W .
THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 382 (1-2) :1-16
[10]  
Koroneos C, 2004, ENERG SOURCE, V26, P1277, DOI 10.1080/00908310490441467