Comparing Apparent Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements of a Multi-receiver EMI Sensor with Topsoil and Profile Magnetic Susceptibility Data over Weak Magnetic Anomalies

被引:26
作者
De Smedt, Philippe [1 ]
Saey, Timothy [1 ]
Meerschman, Eef [1 ]
De Reu, Jeroen [2 ]
De Clercq, Wim [2 ]
Van Meirvenne, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Soil Management, Res Grp Soil Spatial Inventory Tech, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Archaeol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Electromagnetic induction; magnetic susceptibility; apparent magnetic susceptibility; multi-receiver EMI; susceptiblity profiling; Bartington MS2; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY; SENSITIVITY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1002/arp.1467
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Today, most surveys in archaeogeophysical prospection use magnetic properties to detect archaeological features. Such magnetic surveys are usually conducted with magnetometers and, to a lesser extent, with magnetic susceptibility meters and electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors. Although the latter are the only instruments that allow mapping multiple physical soil properties simultaneously, EMI remains the odd-one-out in archaeogeophysical prospection. Nevertheless, by simultaneously recording the electric and magnetic soil variability, EMI survey can be beneficial in early archaeological evaluation stages, because detailed pedological and archaeological information is gathered at the same time. Furthermore, by using multi-receiver EMI instruments vertical soil variation also can be integrated into the survey. However, although the potential of EMI for mapping electric soil variations is well known from advances in soil science, magnetic susceptibility measurements have been investigated less. Here we show the potential of a multi-receiver EMI survey to detect weak magnetic anomalies by measuring the apparent magnetic susceptibility (a) of multiple soil volumes at a test site. The shallow a data were compared with topsoil susceptibility measurements using a magnetic susceptibility loop sensor survey, and with magnetic susceptibility profiling using a probe sensor for evaluating the deeper a-data. Further comparisons were made between these datasets and aerial photography and field walking data. We found that the multiple EMI a measurements allowed for a straightforward discrimination of the natural and anthropogenic magnetic variations of shallow and deeper soil volumes, and allowed visualizing weak magnetic anomalies. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Comparing bulk soil electrical conductivity determination using the DUALEM-1S and EM38-DD electromagnetic induction instruments [J].
Abdu, H. ;
Robinson, D. A. ;
Jones, S. B. .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2007, 71 (01) :189-196
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, INTRO APPL ENV GEOPH
[3]  
[Anonymous], SCI SITE EVALUATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1966, EXPLORATIONISTS GUID, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.155.3767.1234-A
[5]  
[Anonymous], BAR INT SERIES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ARCHAEOL PROSPEC, DOI [10.1002/(SICI) 1099-0763(199903)6:13.0.CO
[7]  
2-N, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199903)6:13.0.CO
[8]  
2-N]
[9]  
Butler D.K., 2005, NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYS
[10]   Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments [J].
Callegary, James B. ;
Ferre, Ty P. A. ;
Groom, R. W. .
VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2007, 6 (01) :158-167