Training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in an airway management manikin

被引:15
作者
Micaglio, Massimo
Doglioni, Nicoletta
Parotto, Matteo
Zanardo, Vincenzo
Ori, Carlo
Trevisanuto, Daniele
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol & Anesthesiol, IT-35121 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, IT-35121 Padua, Italy
关键词
neonatal resuscitation; laryngeal mask airway; manikin;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01921.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background : Neonatal resuscitation is a mandatory skill for healthcare professionals involved in maternity suites. For ethical reasons, it is impossible to teach and practice airway management skills on neonates, and manikins are used for this purpose. The Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway TM (cLMA) is accepted as an effective device for airway management during neonatal resuscitation. A neonatal size of the LMA-ProSeal(TM) (PLMA) was recently produced, but there are no comparative data on its performance. We describe the comparison of the performances of the neonatal cLMA and the neonatal PLMA when used by different healthcare professionals in a dedicated airway management manikin. Methods: Thirty-five healthcare professionals, were given a brief description of the two devices followed by 15 min of supervised insertions on a single manikin. Every trainee was then instructed to insert both devices four times. The time from insertion to the first inflation of the artificial lungs (insertion time, IT) was recorded by a single unblinded observer. Results: No failed insertions were recorded. The success rates of the first attempt were higher with the PLMA than the cLMA (97.1% vs 92.1%; P < 0.01). The mean +/- SD (range) IT was significantly lower with the cLMA compared with the PLMA [10.47 +/- 2.85 (6-22) s vs 11.34 +/- 2.5 (7-18) s; P < 0.01]. The mean +/- SD (range) IT of the cLMA was 12.31 +/- 3.54 (7-22) s for the first positioning and 9.2 +/- 2.34 (6-16) s for the fourth (P < 0.01). The mean +/- SD (range) IT of the PLMA was 12.71 +/- 2.52 (8-18) s for the first positioning and 10.17 +/- 2.28 (7-14) s for the fourth (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences among groups. Conclusions: Both LMAs are easy to insert by different delivery-room workers. PLMA (with the introducer tool) has a higher success rate at first attempt than cLMA. Manikin ventilation was established equally without difference in performance among doctors, nurses, midwives. A brief manikin-training reduces the IT significantly. The longer IT of PLMA vs cLMA is without clinical relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1031
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, CIRCULATION, V112
  • [2] The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent
    Brain, AIJ
    Verghese, C
    Strube, PJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (05) : 650 - 654
  • [3] The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway - A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [4] A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal™ and Classic™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    Fullekrug, B
    Agrò, F
    Rosenblatt, W
    Dierdorf, SF
    de Lucas, EG
    Capdevilla, X
    Brimacombe, N
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (02) : 289 - 295
  • [5] THE ADVANTAGES OF THE LMA OVER THE TRACHEAL TUBE OR FACEMASK - A METAANALYSIS
    BRIMACOMBE, J
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (11): : 1017 - 1023
  • [6] Manikin training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway
    Gandini, D
    Brimacombe, J
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 14 (06) : 493 - 494
  • [7] ILCOR advisory statement: Resuscitation of the newly born infant - An advisory statement from the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Kattwinkel, J
    Niermeyer, S
    Nadkarni, V
    Tibballs, J
    Phillips, B
    Zideman, D
    Van Reempts, P
    Osmond, M
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1999, 103 (04)
  • [8] USE OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN NEONATAL RESUSCITATION
    LAVIES, NG
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (04) : 352 - 352
  • [9] NEONATAL RESUSCITATION USING THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY
    PATERSON, SJ
    BYRNE, PJ
    MOLESKY, MG
    SEAL, RF
    FINUCANE, BT
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (06) : 1248 - 1253
  • [10] Laryngeal mask airway: is the management of neonates requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth changing?
    Trevisanuto, D
    Micaglio, M
    Pitton, M
    Magarotto, M
    Piva, D
    Zanardo, V
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2004, 62 (02) : 151 - 157